Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117824›Full record

ArticleUrolithiasis2025

In-vitro evaluation of intra-cavity pressures across various flexible ureteroscope and ureteral access sheath size combinations.

Weiliang Chong, Bernice Taam, Wei Jin Chua

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Urolithiasis, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Weiliang Chong *Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.
Bernice Taam *Department of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore. bernice.taam@mohh.com.sg.
Wei Jin ChuaDepartment of Urology, National University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The primary aim was to assess how various flexible ureteroscopes and ureteral access sheath size combinations affected intra-cavity pressures, under excessive irrigation pressures with a pressure bag. The secondary aim was to determine the maximum irrigation pressure that could be applied while still maintaining safe intra-cavity pressures, when a certain sheath-scope combination had resulted in an unsafe intra-cavity pressure in the initial experiment. An in-vitro setup was used to measure intra-cavity pressures across different flexible ureteroscope (6.3-9.6 Fr; Hugemed, Innovex and WiScope) and sheath size (ClearPetra; inner lumen diameter 9.5-12 Fr, lengths 40 and 50 cm) combinations. A steady irrigation pressure was delivered via a pressure bag pressurised to 360 mmHg, and a urodynamic machine provided real-time readings of intra-cavity pressure. For each combination, the steady-state intra-cavity pressure was recorded. Combinations generating an unsafe intra-cavity pressure (i.e. intra-cavity pressure of more than 30 mmHg) were re-assessed by gradually reducing the irrigation pressure, until intra-cavity pressure recorded reached 30 mmHg. The corresponding irrigation pressure was then recorded, and the experiment was then repeated with this established safe irrigation pressure to confirm that a safe intra-cavity pressure had been achieved. An intra-cavity pressure of 30 mmHg was taken to be the determined safe threshold for intra-cavity pressure. High intra-cavity pressures were observed with smaller sheaths and larger scopes, exceeding 100 mmHg in some combinations. Longer sheaths tended to generate higher pressures than shorter ones. The use of 12 Fr sheaths or 6.3 Fr scopes appeared to be safe regardless of the paired scope or sheath, even under extreme inflow pressure. Scope and sheath combinations have a significant impact on intra-cavity pressure, and inappropriate combinations may lead to unsafely elevated pressures. Larger sheaths and smaller scopes offer safer pressure profiles, even under high flow or high-pressure irrigation.

Indexed as

UreterUreteroscopesUreteroscopyEquipment DesignHumansIn Vitro TechniquesPressureTherapeutic IrrigationUrodynamicsFlexible and navigable sheathsIntra-renal pressureRenal stonesRetrograde intrarenal surgery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.