Observational studyThe Journal of international medical research2025
Patterns of thoracic injury in bomb blast victims: A retrospective radiological review.
Observational study in The Journal of international medical research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
IntroductionBombings, accounting for approximately 50% of global terrorist incidents, frequently cause high-morbidity thoracic trauma, including blast lung injury. This retrospective radiological review characterizes injury patterns in bomb blast victims to guide mass casualty response and improve patient outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective observational review, conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital (January 2004-October 2024), included 130 patients with bomb blast injuries. Demographics, injury mechanisms, and imaging findings were categorized by blast type and summarized using frequencies, percentages, medians, and interquartile ranges.ResultsAmong 130 victims (94.6% males; median (interquartile range) age, 32 (26.0-43.5) years), initial chest X-ray was performed in 85.4% of cases, detecting foreign bodies (22.8%), emphysema (10.4%), and atelectasis (10.4%). Computed tomography was performed in 28.5% of the patients on the second imaging assessment; however, foreign bodies and atelectasis persisted at 14.4%-15.9% on follow-up. Primary blast injuries predominated (68.4%-78.8%), followed by secondary (15.0%-23.3%), tertiary (0%-4.7%), and quaternary (1.8%-4.4%) injuries; additionally, 48.5% of patients did not undergo a third study.ConclusionsPrimary blast injuries predominate, with frequent foreign bodies, emphysema, and atelectasis. Initial chest X-ray facilitates rapid assessment, while computed tomography is reserved for complex cases. Tailored imaging protocols may enhance timely care and outcomes in resource-limited settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.