ArticleJournal of insect science (Online)2025
Induced brood breaks by refrigerated bee storage in spring: an effective strategy for Varroa destructor (Mesostigmata: Varroidae) control in honey bee colonies.
Article in Journal of insect science (Online), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Honey bee genetic resistance outperforms a cold-storage induced halt in brood production to control mites and viruses.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
During winter months, a significant portion of commercial honey bee (Apis mellifera L.) colonies are stored indoors to overwinter in climate-controlled conditions. However, refrigerated bee storage facilities could be a useful tool at other times of the year in an integrated pest management approach to control the infamous Varroa destructor Anderson and Trueman. Here, we investigated the efficacy of using refrigerated bee storage in the spring to temporarily disrupt honey bee brood production, followed by treating colonies with miticides that perform best in times of low brood production. Immediately following commercial spring pollination in California almonds, colonies were moved to refrigerated bee storage or an apiary as a control. After 18 d, colonies in refrigerated bee storage were relocated to the apiary, and all colonies were treated with a miticide. Bee samples, frames of bees, and hive weights were recorded at the time of miticide application and 37 d later. While there were no statistically significant differences in hive weight or number of frames of bees, colonies that experienced an induced brood break had significantly lower Varroa loads (mites per 100 bees) than colonies that did not experience a brood break. This study demonstrates a viable large-scale method to increase the efficacy of and decrease the need for reapplication of miticides for Varroa control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.