Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117694›Full record

ArticleUlusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES2025

Management of minimal pneumothorax in penetrating chest trauma: Is observation safe?

Salih Duman, Rassim Kassim, Eren Erdoğdu, Leman Damla Ercan, Ali Fuat Kaan Gök, Berker Özkan, Mehmet İlhan, Murat Kara, Cemalettin Ertekin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Salih DumanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Rassim KassimDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Eren ErdoğduDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Leman Damla ErcanDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Ali Fuat Kaan GökDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Berker ÖzkanDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Mehmet İlhanDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Murat KaraDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.
Cemalettin ErtekinDepartment of General Surgery, Istanbul University Faculty of Medicine, İstanbul-Türkiye.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTraumatic pneumothorax is one of the most common findings encountered after chest trauma and often forces clinicians to quickly decide between tube thoracostomy and observation. Although large pneumothoraces (LP), most often defined radiologically as a pleural gap greater than 2 cm, are routinely managed with chest tube drainage, the management of minimal pneumothoraces (MP) is still a matter of debate.

methodsIn this study, we analyzed 193 consecutive penetrating thoracic trauma patients managed in our center over a five-year period (2020-2025). Patients were classified into minimal pneumothorax and large pneumothorax groups based on computed tomography (CT) findings. Clinical and radiological parameters, Injury Severity Score (ISS), complications, and hospital stay were recorded, and their associations with chest tube placement were assessed.

resultsAmong the 193 patients, 112 (58%) were in the MP group and 81 (42%) in the LP group. The median age was comparable between groups (30.5 years [interquartile range, IQR: 22.8-39.3] vs. 28 years [IQR: 23-39], p=0.797). Gender distribution was also similar, with males accounting for 93.3% in the MP group and 93.8% in the LP group (p=1.000). Pneumothorax size strongly influenced treatment (p<0.001): chest tube thoracostomy was performed in 95.1% of LP vs. 9.8% of MP cases. Conservative observation was successful in 90.2% of MP patients. LP patients had significantly longer hospital stays (8.29 vs. 4.56 days, p<0.001), higher ICU admission rates (27.2% vs. 5.4%, p<0.001), and higher ISS (21.33 vs. 13.68, p<0.001). Complications were more frequent in LP (24.7% vs. 0.9%, p<0.001), with hemothorax, persistent air leak, and pleural effusion being the most common. Most hemothorax cases were attributed to the initial penetrating trauma, while only a small minority were tube-related. Among patients with LP (>2 cm), four were managed conservatively due to their stable clinical condition, and no mortality occurred in this subgroup. Mortality occurred exclusively in the chest tube group (18/88, 20.5%), with no deaths among observed patients overall (p<0.001). In subgroup analysis, gunshot wounds were associated with a higher need for chest tube even in MP (20.7% vs. 6.0%, p=0.033).

conclusionOur findings indicate that careful observation is a safe option in patients with minimal pneumothoraces, while large pneumothoraces generally necessitate invasive treatment and are associated with worse outcomes. Our results are consistent with previous reports in the international literature.

Indexed as

PneumothoraxThoracic InjuriesWounds, PenetratingAdultChest TubesFemaleHumansInjury Severity ScoreLength of StayMaleRetrospective StudiesThoracostomyTomography, X-Ray ComputedYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID41117694
PMCPMC12782674

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.