ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025
The Achilles' heel of the Trojan Horse? A systematic evaluation of cefiderocol susceptibility testing.
Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality of patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Article
- Cefiderocol in Children with Hematologic Malignancies-The Multicenter Retrospective Experience of the Infection Working Group of the Italian Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Association (AIEOP).Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Impact of Susceptibility Testing Methodology on the Positioning of Cefiderocol and Aztreonam-Avibactam Against Metallo-β-Lactamase-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cefiderocol, an innovative siderophore cephalosporin, presents a novel therapeutic option against a spectrum of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens. Nevertheless, resistance remains a formidable challenge, particularly among metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms. Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for cefiderocol is complex due to the labour-intensive broth microdilution (BMD) reference method requiring iron-depleted media, lacking reproducibility. In response, commercial AST methods, including BMD panels, disc diffusion (DD), and gradient diffusion test, have been developed. Commercial BMD panels, such as ComASP® and UMIC®, demonstrate potential, with the latter reaching categorical agreement (CA) above 90%. Yet, essential agreement (EA) remains between 75% and 85%, below the 90% desired threshold, with very major errors (VMEs) occurring frequently (∼15%). Disc diffusion (DD) methods, while practical, often overcall resistance, leading to major errors (MEs) with a median across studies of 29%. Among disc manufacturers, MASTDISCS® performed best, with a pooled CA of 93.2%, 5.4% ME and 6.3% VME. Overall, discs recorded a CA of 79.4%, MEs of 29.0% and VMEs of 13.9%. Gradient diffusion tests performed least favourably among all methods, exhibiting a notably high VME rate of 41.1%, and their use should be limited. Cefiderocol AST is further complicated by disparities between European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoints, contributing to inconsistencies in susceptibility categorization across laboratories. Additional challenges, such as trailing endpoints and microcolonies within inhibition zones, further confound readings, especially in DD assays. Consequently, the standardization and rigorous validation of the best performing cefiderocol AST methodologies are imperative to ensure reliable susceptibility outcomes and optimized outcomes for patients with MDR infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.