Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117673›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy2025

The Achilles' heel of the Trojan Horse? A systematic evaluation of cefiderocol susceptibility testing.

Deny Tsakri, Stefanos Ferous, Ioannis Baltas, Louis Grandjean, Cleo Anastassopoulou, Athanasios Tsakris

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Clinical, microbiological, and molecular characteristics, outcomes, and risk factors for mortality of patients with Stenotrophomonas maltophilia bloodstream infection.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Deny TsakriDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Stefanos FerousDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.ORCID 0009-0003-4670-5786
Ioannis BaltasInfection, Immunity & Inflammation Department, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Louis GrandjeanInfection, Immunity & Inflammation Department, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK.
Cleo AnastassopoulouDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Athanasios TsakrisDepartment of Microbiology, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefiderocol, an innovative siderophore cephalosporin, presents a novel therapeutic option against a spectrum of multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens. Nevertheless, resistance remains a formidable challenge, particularly among metallo-beta-lactamase (MBL)-producing organisms. Accurate antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) for cefiderocol is complex due to the labour-intensive broth microdilution (BMD) reference method requiring iron-depleted media, lacking reproducibility. In response, commercial AST methods, including BMD panels, disc diffusion (DD), and gradient diffusion test, have been developed. Commercial BMD panels, such as ComASP® and UMIC®, demonstrate potential, with the latter reaching categorical agreement (CA) above 90%. Yet, essential agreement (EA) remains between 75% and 85%, below the 90% desired threshold, with very major errors (VMEs) occurring frequently (∼15%). Disc diffusion (DD) methods, while practical, often overcall resistance, leading to major errors (MEs) with a median across studies of 29%. Among disc manufacturers, MASTDISCS® performed best, with a pooled CA of 93.2%, 5.4% ME and 6.3% VME. Overall, discs recorded a CA of 79.4%, MEs of 29.0% and VMEs of 13.9%. Gradient diffusion tests performed least favourably among all methods, exhibiting a notably high VME rate of 41.1%, and their use should be limited. Cefiderocol AST is further complicated by disparities between European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) and Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI)/Food and Drug Administration (FDA) breakpoints, contributing to inconsistencies in susceptibility categorization across laboratories. Additional challenges, such as trailing endpoints and microcolonies within inhibition zones, further confound readings, especially in DD assays. Consequently, the standardization and rigorous validation of the best performing cefiderocol AST methodologies are imperative to ensure reliable susceptibility outcomes and optimized outcomes for patients with MDR infections.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsCephalosporinsGram-Negative BacteriaCefiderocolHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsReproducibility of ResultsAnti-Bacterial AgentsCefiderocolCephalosporins

Identifiers

PMID41117673
PMCPMC12670166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.