Trial reportEuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology2025
A novel angiographic index for predicting the efficacy of drug-coated balloons in small vessels.
Trial report in EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03625830 (A Randomized, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
A Randomized, Multicenter Study on the Efficacy and Safety of Paclitaxel-eluting PTCA-Balloon Catheter(SeQuent® Please) Compared to POBA in the Treatment of Small Vessel Disease (SVD) Patient
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Angiographic Radial Wall Strain: Plaque Vulnerability or Procedural Dissection Risk?JACC. Asia · 2026Article
- From anatomy to vulnerability: A comprehensive appraisal of coronary physiology and plaque characterization.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2026Review
- Drug-coated balloon angioplasty in coronary artery disease: state of the art review.NPJ cardiovascular health · 2026Review
- Drug-coated balloons vs. drug-eluting stents for coronary artery disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials with lesion-specific insights.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe drug delivery eï¬ciency of drug-coated balloons (DCBs) in de novo coronary artery disease is correlated with atherosclerotic plaque characteristics. It remains to be elucidated whether plaque composition and vulnerability can affect the efficacy of DCBs.
aimsThis study aimed to explore the association between a novel angiography-based radial wall strain (RWS) measurement for plaque vulnerability and DCB efficacy in de novo small vessel disease (SVD).
methodsThis study is a post hoc analysis of 266 SVD lesions in 260 patients treated with a paclitaxelâcoated balloon or plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA) from the PEPCAD China SVD study. The baseline maximum RWS (RWS
resultsA total of 152 and 72 lesions in the DCB and POBA groups, respectively, completed the 9-month angiographic follow-up. In the DCB group, lesions with RWS
conclusionsAngiographically derived RWS has the potential to predict the angiographic and clinical outcomes of DCB treatment for de novo SVD (PEPCAD China SVD study; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03625830).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.