Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117608›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical microbiology2026

Self-collection for primary HPV screening using dry swabs: a review of clinical performance, laboratory considerations, and patient preferences.

Mondraya F Howard, Ria C Fyffe-Freil, Christina C Pierre, Henrietta O Maku, Stefania Di Costanzo, Thomas S Lorey, Dina N Greene

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mondraya F HowardDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Penn Medicine Lancaster General Health, Lancaster, Pennsylvania, USA.
Ria C Fyffe-FreilDepartment of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Christina C PierreDepartment of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Henrietta O MakuDepartment of Pathology and Genomics, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas, USA.
Stefania Di CostanzoCopan Italia S.p.A, Brescia, Italy.
Thomas S LoreyIndependent Researcher, Oakland, California, USA.
Dina N GreeneDepartment of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6966-9904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

For cervical cancer screening, testing for high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) detects more high-grade precancerous lesions, has a higher negative predictive value, and requires fewer lifetime screenings compared to cytology. As a result, both the US Preventive Services Task Force and the World Health Organization have endorsed hrHPV testing as the preferred screening method. Despite the utility, there are significant implementation challenges to adopting hrHPV primary screening across patients, providers, and institutions that must be addressed to ensure its widespread effectiveness. Here, we take a laboratory-centric approach to reviewing hrHPV primary screening, including discussion of specimen types and collection methods. For user experience, clinical and analytical validations, we focused on self-collected vaginal swab specimens stored dry during transport. Our analysis indicates that clinical laboratories should do their part to engage with institutional and clinical leadership to validate and promote the use of vaginal self-sampling for cervical cancer screening options within and outside the clinic. This work highlights the multiple studies that have validated dry swab collection as a simplified and high-quality method for hrHPV detection.

Indexed as

Early Detection of CancerPapillomaviridaePapillomavirus InfectionsSelf CareSpecimen HandlingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsFemaleHumansMass ScreeningPatient Preferencecervical cancerdry swabHPVpre-analyticalprimary screeningself-collectionvaginal swab

Identifiers

PMID41117608
PMCPMC12892960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.