ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025
Detection of protozoan and helminth parasites in concentrated wet mounts of stool using a deep convolutional neural network.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of the AI-predictive ParaScoutEmerging microbes & infections · 2026Article
- Performance of the Techcyte AI-based image analysis system for coproparasitological diagnosis in clinical stool specimens: a retrospective evaluation study.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Diagnosing helminth infections in a large reference laboratory in the United States: a 6-month pre- and post-implementation analysis of AI-augmented screening of concentrated fecal wet mounts.Journal of clinical microbiology · 2026Article
- Validation of Digital Slide Scanning and a Convolutional Neural Network for the Detection of Intestinal Parasites in Human Stool Samples.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Comprehensive diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites is largely reliant on traditional stool microscopy, despite gains in molecular diagnostics. Wet-mount examinations remain a significant challenge for traditional microscopy, digital microscopy, and artifical intelligence (AI). We developed and validated a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model that provides highly sensitive detection and presumptive classification of enteric parasites. Twenty-seven different parasites were trained on a CNN model using a wide diversity of 4,049 unique parasite-positive specimens (determined by traditional microscopy) collected in the USA, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Model validation was performed with a unique holdout set. In clinical validation, AI correctly detected 250/265 positive specimens (94.3% agreement) and 94/100 negative specimens (94.0%) before discrepant resolution. AI also detected 169 additional organisms from the validation specimens that were not previously identified. These additional detections underwent further discrepant analysis to adjudicate the results by scan review and microscopy. After resolution and inclusion of newly defined true positives and false positives, the positive agreement was 472/477 (98.6%). Negative agreement was variable by organism, ranging from 91.8% to 100%. A relative limit of detection study was performed comparing AI to three technologists of varying experience using serial dilutions of specimens containing
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.