Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117595›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2025

Detection of protozoan and helminth parasites in concentrated wet mounts of stool using a deep convolutional neural network.

Blaine A Mathison, Katie Knight, Jill Potts, Ben Black, John F Walker, Falon Markow, Amy Wood, Dustin Bess, Ken Dixon, Brian Cahoon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Development and validation of the AI-predictive ParaScoutEmerging microbes & infections · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Blaine A MathisonInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9975-941X
Katie KnightInstitute for Research and Innovation in Diagnostic and Precision Medicine, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Jill PottsTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Ben BlackTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
John F WalkerTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Falon MarkowTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Amy WoodTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Dustin BessTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Ken DixonTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Brian CahoonTechcyte Inc., Orem, Utah, USA.
Weston HymasInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.
Marc Roger CouturierInstitute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, ARUP Laboratories, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA.ORCID 0009-0009-4324-0382

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehensive diagnosis of gastrointestinal parasites is largely reliant on traditional stool microscopy, despite gains in molecular diagnostics. Wet-mount examinations remain a significant challenge for traditional microscopy, digital microscopy, and artifical intelligence (AI). We developed and validated a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) model that provides highly sensitive detection and presumptive classification of enteric parasites. Twenty-seven different parasites were trained on a CNN model using a wide diversity of 4,049 unique parasite-positive specimens (determined by traditional microscopy) collected in the USA, Europe, Africa, and Asia. Model validation was performed with a unique holdout set. In clinical validation, AI correctly detected 250/265 positive specimens (94.3% agreement) and 94/100 negative specimens (94.0%) before discrepant resolution. AI also detected 169 additional organisms from the validation specimens that were not previously identified. These additional detections underwent further discrepant analysis to adjudicate the results by scan review and microscopy. After resolution and inclusion of newly defined true positives and false positives, the positive agreement was 472/477 (98.6%). Negative agreement was variable by organism, ranging from 91.8% to 100%. A relative limit of detection study was performed comparing AI to three technologists of varying experience using serial dilutions of specimens containing

Indexed as

FecesHelminthiasisHelminthsIntestinal Diseases, ParasiticNeural Networks, ComputerParasitesProtozoan InfectionsAnimalsConvolutional Neural NetworksHumansMicroscopySensitivity and Specificityartificial intelligenceconvolutional neural networkhelminthparasiteparasitologyprotozoan

Identifiers

PMID41117595
PMCPMC12607898

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.