Observational studyScience progress
Tomographic assessment of glenoid fossa morphology and position in symmetric and asymmetric patients.
Observational study in Science progress. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Evaluation of Temporomandibular Joint Morphology According to the Occlusal Relationship Between Dental Arches Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
ObjectiveTo assess positional and morphological characteristics of the glenoid fossa in patients with and without craniofacial asymmetry using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), and to identify structural adaptations associated with temporomandibular joint (TMJ) compensation.MethodsAn observational study analyzed CBCT scans from 47 patients: 36 with facial asymmetry and 11 symmetric controls. Morphometric measurements (vertical, anteroposterior, and transverse positions; angular and depth parameters) were taken in sagittal, coronal, and axial planes using standardized anatomical references. Statistical analyses included independent and
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.