Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117405›Full record

ArticleThe veterinary quarterly2025

Automated segmentation of canine pulmonary masses in CT imaging using AI.

Artur Jurgas, Silvia Burti, Marek Wodziński, Caterina Puccinelli, Giunio Bruto Cherubini, Simonetta Citi, Giulia Poloni, Nicolò Mastromattei, Margherita Bendazzoli, Diane Wilson and 2 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in The veterinary quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Artur JurgasDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Krakow, PL, Poland.
Silvia BurtiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Marek WodzińskiDepartment of Measurement and Electronics, AGH University of Krakow, Krakow, PL, Poland.
Caterina PuccinelliDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Giunio Bruto CherubiniDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Simonetta CitiDepartment of Veterinary Sciences, University of Pisa, San Piero a Grado, Pisa, Italy.
Giulia PoloniDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Nicolò MastromatteiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Margherita BendazzoliDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Diane WilsonAntech Imaging Services, Fountain Valley, California, US.
Alessandro ZottiDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.
Tommaso BanzatoDepartment of Animal Medicine, Production and Health, University of Padua, Legnaro, Padua, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Primary pulmonary lung cancer is rare in dogs, and clinicians increasingly rely on advanced imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, manual lesion segmentation can be time-consuming and subject to operator variability. This retrospective study compiled a multicenter dataset of canine CT scans containing at least one pulmonary mass measuring more than 2 cm. Data were collected from two university veterinary hospitals and a teleradiology service, encompassing varying acquisition protocols and scanner types. Lesions were manually segmented to create ground truth masks, and an AI model was trained and evaluated using the nnUNet v2 framework with a 5-fold cross-validation approach. Performance on a separate test set of 30 scans was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD). The databse was made of 217 cases. The training/validation set comprised 187 cases. The model's segmentation accuracy was tested on 30 cases. The trained model had a high segmentation accuracy on the test set, with a mean DSC of 0.91 and an ASSD of 1.88 mm. The model had high performance on homogeneous, well-defined masses, whereas the presence of intralesional mineralisation or pleural effusion had a negative impact on the model's performance.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceDog DiseasesLung NeoplasmsTomography, X-Ray ComputedAnimalsDogsFemaleMaleRetrospective StudiesComputed tomographyDice scorelung masssegmentationsU-Net

Identifiers

PMID41117405
PMCPMC12581763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.