ArticleThe veterinary quarterly2025
Automated segmentation of canine pulmonary masses in CT imaging using AI.
Article in The veterinary quarterly, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis of Respiratory Diseases in Dogs and Cats: A Systematic Review.Veterinary sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary pulmonary lung cancer is rare in dogs, and clinicians increasingly rely on advanced imaging for diagnosis and treatment planning. However, manual lesion segmentation can be time-consuming and subject to operator variability. This retrospective study compiled a multicenter dataset of canine CT scans containing at least one pulmonary mass measuring more than 2 cm. Data were collected from two university veterinary hospitals and a teleradiology service, encompassing varying acquisition protocols and scanner types. Lesions were manually segmented to create ground truth masks, and an AI model was trained and evaluated using the nnUNet v2 framework with a 5-fold cross-validation approach. Performance on a separate test set of 30 scans was quantified using the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and Average Symmetric Surface Distance (ASSD). The databse was made of 217 cases. The training/validation set comprised 187 cases. The model's segmentation accuracy was tested on 30 cases. The trained model had a high segmentation accuracy on the test set, with a mean DSC of 0.91 and an ASSD of 1.88 mm. The model had high performance on homogeneous, well-defined masses, whereas the presence of intralesional mineralisation or pleural effusion had a negative impact on the model's performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.