Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117391›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine and science2025

Evaluation of Locally Available Detergents for Detection of Subclinical Mastitis in Ugandan Dairy Cattle.

Denis Rwabiita Mugizi, Benjamin Kulaaza, Patrick Arthur Kalibbala, Gerald Nizeyimana, Paul Ssuna

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Denis Rwabiita MugiziCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2072-8210
Benjamin KulaazaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Patrick Arthur KalibbalaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Gerald NizeyimanaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.
Paul SsunaCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Animal Resources and Biosecurity, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mastitis remains a major production constraint of dairy cattle farmers in Uganda leading to reduced production. Subclinical mastitis, though often ignored, is more prevalent and causes more economic losses compared to clinical mastitis. Studies have shown a consistently high prevalence of subclinical mastitis in different areas of Uganda. Screening is crucial in the control of subclinical mastitis but the most used screening test, the California Mastitis Test, is rather expensive and widely inaccessible to most poor farmers in Uganda. Research has shown that laundry detergents can accurately screen for subclinical mastitis which would be convenient for farmers in Uganda due to their cheapness and availability country wide. The aim of this study was to establish the prevalence of subclinical mastitis in dairy cattle in Kampala, the cow level risk factors and to determine the effectiveness of locally available domestic detergents in screening for subclinical mastitis. The study was carried out on 140 randomly selected lactating cattle in urban and peri-urban Kampala, Uganda. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was determined using the California Mastitis Test (CMT). Optimized concentrations of the different detergent solutions were then tested using the same procedure as the CMT and their scores based on the gel formation of reagent with milk were recorded. A cow with at least one quarter with score ≥ 1 was considered positive for subclinical mastitis. The prevalence of subclinical mastitis was 81.6%. Parity and breed were significantly associated with subclinical mastitis. Primiparous cows were less susceptible (Odds ratio = 0.189; 95% CI: 0.069-0.521) as compared to multiparous. Friesians were more susceptible to subclinical mastitis (Odds ratio = 8.047; 95% CI: 1.268-51.078) compared to the local breeds. The Fleiss kappa, k = 0.556 (95% CI: 0.504-0.608, p < 0.001) in the ability to detect subclinical mastitis was seen in all detergents tested indicating a moderate to substantial reliability of the detergents when compared with the commercial CMT reagent. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) of the detergents as compared to the CMT, ranged from 0.814 to 0.905 implying a high to excellent accuracy. Six (6%) magic detergent showed the best performance (AUC: 0.905) of all the locally available domestic detergents used in Uganda. This showed that local domestic detergents can be used as an alternative to the expensive and inaccessible CMT to detect subclinical mastitis in Uganda. This study therefore recommends veterinary legislation on the usage of domestic detergents in screening for subclinical mastitis and a willingness study by farmers in Uganda to uptake this diagnostic procedure.

Indexed as

DetergentsMastitis, BovineAnimalsCattleDairyingFemalePrevalenceRisk FactorsSensitivity and SpecificityUgandaDetergentsCalifornia Mastitis Testdetectionmastitiswashing detergents

Identifiers

PMID41117391
PMCPMC12538625

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.