ReviewAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2025
Beyond prion-like spreading in neurodegenerative disease.
Review in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond prion-like spreading in neurodegenerative disease.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To design effective therapies for neurodegenerative diseases, it is critical to understand the processes that trigger protein aggregation in sequential brain regions as the disease progresses. Aggregates formed in many neurodegenerative diseases, including Alzheimer's and Parkinson's disease, are capable of seeding, leading to the proposal to regard them all as prion-like. We here argue that the utility of this classification is limited; the terms protein misfolding and aggregation-related diseases describe the general class of diseases, and the connotation of prion-like that the spreading of infectious prions is the rate-limiting process narrows the view of possible mechanisms. Instead, we suggest four factors along which to compare different diseases and model systems, providing a clearer basis to consider the different ways in which pathology can spread, account for factors beyond the aggregating protein, such as declining protein homeostasis with age, and understand the differences between model systems and human disease. HIGHLIGHTS: Four aspects by which to classify neurodegenerative diseases are proposed. Aggregates in health and inflammation are important factors. Prion-like spreading classification is not sufficient to capture the necessary nuance. Different diseases and model systems are dominated by different aspects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.