ArticleActas espanolas de psiquiatria2025
Understanding the Burden of Mental Illness Induced by Workplace Mobbing: A Scoping Review.
Article in Actas espanolas de psiquiatria, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Psychometric Validation of the Spanish Version of the Luxembourg Workplace Mobbing Scale (LWMS): Structural Equation Modeling, and Item Response Theory Evidence.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWorkplace mobbing affects approximately 20% of workers worldwide, yet about 70% of victims do not report it, limiting the full understanding of its true impact. While previous research has established its association with mental health disorders, the broader burden-including burden of disease (BOD), cost of illness (COI), and productivity loss (PL)-remains underexplored. This scoping review aims to address this gap by mapping the existing literature on the BOD and economic costs associated with mobbing-related mental health disorders.
methodsWe conducted a scoping review following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. A systematic search in National Library of Medicine's bibliographic database (MEDLINE), Latin American and Caribbean Literature in Health Sciences (LILACS), Embase, Scopus, and PsycInfo databases (until June 30, 2021) identified primary studies and reviews assessing BOD, COI, or PL in adults exposed to workplace mobbing. Articles were screened independently by two reviewers in two phases (title/abstract and full-text review). Data extraction focused on study characteristics and key findings, which were categorized into predefined thematic domains.
resultsFourteen studies published between 2008 and 2020 met the selection criteria (71.4% primary studies, 28.6% reviews). The definition of mobbing varied across studies, and frequently, different terms were used interchangeably. None of the included studies quantified disease burden using standard metrics such as disability-adjusted life years (DALYs). Instead, PL was assessed indirectly through absenteeism, presenteeism, and work performance assessments.
conclusionsMobbing is a significant occupational health issue with substantial mental health implications, yet research on its economic and disease burden remains limited. The heterogeneity in definitions and methodologies across studies hampers comparability and synthesis. Future research should adopt standardized definitions and employ robust burden-of-disease frameworks, such as DALYs and Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs), to better quantify the impact of mobbing on mental health and work productivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.