ArticleAndrology2026
INSL3 Expression in Leydig Cells is a Biomarker for Immunocastration in Boars: Transcriptional Evidence.
Article in Andrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Histology and mRNA expression of unilateral testicular atrophy in three immunocastrated boars: a case report.BMC veterinary research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundStudy aimed to obtain insights into physiological responses to immunocastration in pubertal boars by evaluating effects of alternative vaccination protocols and identifying a reliable immunocastration biomarker.
objectivesIt was hypothesized that the timing of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) suppression by immunocastration differentially affects reproductive function, as reflected by testicular histology and expression of selected genes related to testicular function, steroid metabolism, and Leydig cell differentiation and function. MATERIALS AND
methodsEffects of three vaccination protocols on antibody titers, testicular histomorphology, and mRNA expression in immunocastrates slaughtered 4, 8, or 12 weeks (IC-4, IC-8, and IC-12, respectively; n = 6 per group) after booster were compared with entire males (EMs; n = 6). Principal component analysis and hierarchical clustering were used to evaluate individual responses and to identify an immunocastration biomarker(s). The selected biomarker was also validated on samples from previous studies.
resultsAll immunocastrated boars reacted immunologically to vaccination (increased GnRH antibody titer; p < 0.004). There was an increased nucleus-to-cytoplasm ratio in Leydig cells (p < 0.033) and decreased testosterone concentration (p < 0.041) in IC-4 compared with EM, whereas values in IC-8 and IC-12 were intermediate. Hierarchical clustering differentiated immunocastrates with low testosterone (IC-LT; median 0.56 ng/mL) and high testosterone (IC-HT; median 7.04 ng/mL). In IC-LT, expression levels of FSHR and ESR2 were higher than in IC-HT, and those of LHCGH, STAR and INSL3 were lower compared with IC-HT and EM, whereas expression of ESR1 and HSD17β7 was lower in IC-LT and IC-HT compared with EM (fold change > 1.5 and p < 0.05).
conclusionThere were variable responses to immunocastration in pubertal boars subjected to three vaccination protocols. Suppression of testicular function was most pronounced in boars slaughtered 4 weeks after the booster, whereas progressive recovery occurred in some boars 8 and 12 weeks after the booster. Irrespective of vaccination protocol, INSL3 mRNA expression was a reliable immunocastration biomarker.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.