ReviewSkin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI)2025
Vitiligo: Ruxolitinib and Other Oral Treatment Options Beyond Ruxolitinib.
Review in Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lichen Planus Pigmentosus Localized to the Glans Penis: A Rare Presentation Treated With Ruxolitinib.Cureus · 2026Article
- Vitiligo: Ruxolitinib and Other Oral Treatment Options Beyond Ruxolitinib.Skin research and technology : official journal of International Society for Bioengineering and the Skin (ISBS) [and] International Society for Digital Imaging of Skin (ISDIS) [and] International Society for Skin Imaging (ISSI) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVitiligo is a chronic autoimmune disorder marked by the loss of melanocytes, causing depigmented patches across the skin. Affecting up to 2% of the global population, vitiligo presents significant psychological impacts, particularly in those with darker skin types. Current hypotheses attribute its etiology to autoimmune destruction, genetic predisposition, and environmental triggers like trauma and stress. MATERIALS AND
methodsA comprehensive review of recent studies was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar, focusing on systemic treatments for vitiligo, particularly JAK inhibitors (ruxolitinib, upadacitinib, tofacitinib, ritlecitinib, and baricitinib). Eligible studies included trials and case reports on adults with vitiligo evaluating treatment efficacy, safety, and tolerability.
resultsTopical ruxolitinib has achieved the highest efficacy in repigmenting facial and sun-exposed areas, particularly when combined with phototherapy. Emerging evidence supports oral Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, especially upadacitinib and tofacitinib, for their repigmenting effects in refractory cases, though side effects like acne and neutropenia warrant monitoring. Limited evidence supports methotrexate and minocycline as adjunct therapies, with minor repigmentation observed.
conclusionAdvances in systemic and topical JAK inhibitors have shown promising repigmentation effects in vitiligo, particularly for localized facial lesions. Ruxolitinib cream, the first FDA-approved therapy, and other JAK inhibitors highlight a growing therapeutic approach, with ongoing trials needed to optimize efficacy and evaluate long-term safety. Combination therapy with phototherapy shows enhanced repigmentation outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.