ArticleAnimal genetics2025
Genomic imprinting at a porcine ZNF locus via a canonical imprinting mechanism.
Article in Animal genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A comprehensive genome-wide scan for parent-of-origin expressed genes in the pig clarifies the conservation landscape of genomic imprinting.Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic imprinting causes parent-of-origin dependent gene expression, primarily driven by a subset of germline differentially methylated regions that function as imprinting control regions at promoter-associated CpG islands. While these mechanisms have been investigated in depth in mice and humans, our understanding of the molecular basis of genomic imprinting in pigs remains limited, particularly at a non-orthologous porcine locus. This study aimed to investigate a pig locus displaying a canonical DNA methylation-dependent imprinting pattern and explore its potential involvement in transcription-coupled imprinting mechanisms. By comparing parthenogenetic and control porcine day-21 embryos, we identified a maternally methylated differentially methylated region in a previously uncharacterized pig locus, LOC100520903 (ZNF300-like), which may serve as an imprinting control region. This was accompanied by a significantly higher paternal mRNA expression of LOC100520903 in control embryos compared to parthenogenetic embryos (p < 0.05), as detected by RNA-seq. At this locus, a previously unannotated transcript with an alternative first exon located far upstream was predominantly expressed in oocytes (supported by >10 RNA-seq junction reads), alongside a promoter marked by H3K4me3 and an adjacent long terminal repeat element (E-value = 5.8e-62). This transcript was no longer detected from embryogenesis onward (0 reads), at which point the annotated LOC100520903 transcripts became expressed. Concurrently, oocyte-specific DNA methylation was observed at the CpG island of the LOC100520903 gene promoter, indicative of maternal methylation. Moreover, in the pig liver and brain, paternal monoallelic expression was consistently observed based on haplotype-tagged RNA-seq reads. Our findings provide mechanistic insights into genomic imprinting at the porcine LOC100520903 locus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.