Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117021›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical virology2025

The Clinical Presentations of Patients With COVID-19 in the Omicron Era: Missed Opportunities in the Antiviral Treatment of SARS-CoV-2 Infections.

G Bartolucci, E Garro, M Mussa, A Pepe, R Angilletta, B Rizzello, F A Ranzani, S Bonora, G Di Perri, A Calcagno

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical virology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

G BartolucciDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.ORCID 0009-0001-6955-6619
E GarroDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
M MussaLocal Health Authority (ASL) Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.
A PepeDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
R AngillettaLocal Health Authority (ASL) Città di Torino, Turin, Italy.
B RizzelloDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
F A RanzaniDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
S BonoraDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
G Di PerriDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.
A CalcagnoDepartment of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

COVID-19 has posed a significant global health challenge. SARS-CoV-2 has accumulated several mutations and adapted to humans, with its clinical manifestations evolving from severe bilateral interstitial pneumonia with respiratory failure to predominantly milder forms of disease. Effective antiviral treatments have been developed but remain underutilized, even in high-risk individuals. We conducted a retrospective study on patients hospitalized for COVID-19 in our hospital's Infectious Disease/COVID-19 wards. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. Demographic, clinical, and therapeutic data were collected. Due to limited viral sequencing, time periods were categorized based on the dominant epidemiological variants: Wild-Type/Alpha (February 2020 to June 2021), Delta (July to December 2021), and Omicron (January 2022 to January 2024). We included 606 patients, of whom 381 (62.9%) were male, with a mean age of 65.5 years (±17.0) and a mean BMI of 26.4 kg/m² (±5.7). The most common comorbidities were arterial hypertension (43.8%), cardiovascular diseases (25.2%) and diabetes (21%). A total of 380 (62.7%)of patients were infected with the Wild-Type variant, 49 (8.1%) with Wild-Type/Alpha, 17 (2.8%)with Alpha, 20 (3.3%)with Alpha/Delta,45 (7.4%)with Delta, 4 (0.7%)with Delta/Omicron, and 91 (15%) with Omicron. The clinical presentation evolved significantly: we observed a decline in the prevalence of fever (78% in Wild-Type vs. 57% in Omicron), myalgia (19% vs. 4%), diarrhoea (15% vs. 3%), rhinorrhoea (9% vs. 1%), and ageusia, which disappeared entirely in Omicron cases. In contrast, neurological symptoms became more frequent, increasing from 13% in Wild-Type to 27% in Omicron infections, with delirium being the most common manifestation (59% of neurological cases). In-hospital mortality was significantly lower with Omicron variants (5.5%) as compared to the older ones (Delta 15.9%, WT/alpha 13.2%, p < 0.001). Out of 256 participants with risk factors for severe disease, 116 (45.3%) could have potentially been treated with anti-SARS-CoV-2 drugs for early treatment: only two patients (1.7%) were treated with such drugs in out-of-hospital settings. These results underscore the importance of targeted vaccination campaigns, enhanced access to early antiviral therapies, and further research to understand evolving clinical patterns and optimize therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Antiviral AgentsCOVID-19COVID-19 Drug TreatmentSARS-CoV-2AdultAgedAged, 80 and overComorbidityFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesAntiviral Agents

Identifiers

PMID41117021
PMCPMC12538379

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.