Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41117005›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

Knowing Me Knowing You-Mentorship in Hospital Placement.

Monika Kvernenes, Hilde Grimstad, Edvin Schei, Cathinka Thyness, Tim Dornan, Terese Stenfors

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Monika KvernenesCentre for Medical Education & Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-6042-6383
Hilde GrimstadDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Torgarden, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-7569-7787
Edvin ScheiDepartment of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-7826-4124
Cathinka ThynessDepartment of Public Health and Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Torgarden, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-8838-9967
Tim DornanCentre for Medical Education, Queens University Belfast, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7830-0183
Terese StenforsDepartment of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-0854-8631

Funding

Norwegian Directorate for Higher Education and Skills
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite junior doctors' pivotal role as primary contacts for students in clinical placements, they are typically offered minimal or no mentor training, and their knowledge about how to facilitate student learning remains experience-based. We developed a co-mentoring program where junior doctors were offered training focused on student learning and agency, near-peer support and the promotion of psychological safety.

methodsTo evaluate the intervention, we collected qualitative data using interviews, e-mail prompts and a focus group among 13 junior doctors across four cohorts of mentor training. No baseline data were included. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. The research aimed to explore the junior doctors' experiences of transitioning from an unclear supervisory role to a defined mentor role with a relational focus.

resultsMentors felt that they were making a significant difference to the students' learning and that focusing on relationship building and belonging enabled entrustment. Furthermore, mentoring was demystified after the training regime. Finally, the concept of collective responsibility throughout the medical department emerged as a crucial element in the mentoring dynamic. DISCUSSION: Respondents suggested that the intervention had shifted their attitudes: Participants realized that establishing contact and actively collaborating with the students, also beyond the mentor's primary team, were beneficial for both students and mentors without demanding additional sacrifices of time or energy. However, the initiative did not manage to change organizational structures or create motivation in mentors to pursue further pedagogic development, underscoring the need to address structural barriers and promote a growth-oriented mindset among mentors.

Indexed as

Medical Staff, HospitalMentoringMentorsStudents, MedicalFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicLearningMalePeer GroupQualitative Researchclinical learning environmentfaculty developmentmentorsnear‐peerworkplace‐based learning

Identifiers

PMID41117005
PMCPMC12538269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.