Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116954›Full record

ReviewCureus2025

The Efficacy of Adjuvant Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy in Chronic Wound Management: A Narrative Review.

Sneha Sahay, Sung Yeon Kwak

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Sneha SahayInternal Medicine, University of Bristol, Bristol, GBR.
Sung Yeon KwakMedical Education, Great Western Hospital, Swindon, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic wounds, or wounds which progress unfavourably through normal stages of healing, place a heavy burden on individuals, impeding their quality of life, and on healthcare systems, with their management annually costing the United Kingdom National Health Service over £5.6 billion. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) has been evidenced for use in a variety of ailments including burns and dive-related injuries. Its physiological effects, such as the stimulation of angiogenesis, bactericidal and bacteriostatic activity, and enhancement of antibiotic potency, have inspired research into its use in the management of hard-to-heal wounds. This narrative review aims to synthesize recent literature to conclude whether adjuvant HBOT improves the healing of chronic wounds when compared with traditional treatment methods. This information could be used to determine whether HBOT should be made a more mainstream treatment option for chronic wounds. A literature search and screening process resulted in 11 studies, which were reviewed, encompassing a variety of chronic wound types. The primary outcome was the rate of wound healing, in terms of complete healing and/or reduction in wound surface area. Secondary outcomes included quality of life, pain, amputation rates, improvement of underlying conditions, and bacterial burden of the wounds. There were some disparities in the literature; while some studies found HBOT to drastically improve the outcome(s), others found no statistically significant difference in healing between the HBOT and standard treatment groups. However, these disparities may be attributable to limitations in the studies or review design. Certainly, there was no evidence that HBOT worsened outcomes compared to traditional management; it was therefore recommended that it be considered earlier as an option for treatment-refractory wounds. When HBOT is unavailable or deemed inappropriate, it is recommended that other methods of oxygen delivery into the wound, such as oxygen dressings, be considered, to avail at least some of oxygen's physiological benefits.

Indexed as

chronic non healing woundsdiabetic foot ulcers (dfus)hyperbaric oxygen therapy (hbot)venous leg ulcerswound care managementwound healing

Identifiers

PMID41116954
PMCPMC12535768

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.