ReviewCureus2025
Advances in Anti-aging Procedures: A Comprehensive Review of Surgical and Non-surgical Rejuvenation Techniques.
Review in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Polycaprolactone versus calcium hydroxylapatite injectable treatments in the T-zone for facial rejuvenation: a clinical comparative study.American journal of translational research · 2026Article
- Advanced on Minimally Invasive Techniques in Facial Rejuvenation: A Comprehensive Review.World journal of plastic surgery · 2026Review
- Impact of High-Intensity Facial Electrical Stimulation Technology on Elevation of the Midface: A Prospective Study With Ultrasound.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
- Longevity Aesthetics: A Conceptual Framework for Integrating Pro-Aging Medicine Into Surgical and Nonsurgical Practice.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Advances in medical science have led to longer lifespans, increasing global demand for cosmetic procedures aimed at preserving or enhancing youthfulness. A wide range of clinical options now targets facial ageing, offering invasive and non-invasive treatments tailored to individual needs, medical factors, and financial considerations. With recent advances in aesthetic technologies and emerging evidence-based results, this narrative review explores recent innovations in anti-ageing interventions, focusing on their effectiveness and potential side effects. This narrative review aims to comprehensively evaluate anti-ageing procedures, including both surgical and non-surgical techniques. It seeks to synthesize current evidence to assess the safety, efficacy, and impact of these interventions on patient outcomes. A narrative review was conducted by searching PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between 2010 and 2025. Keywords included "anti-ageing," "facial rejuvenation," "cosmetic procedures," and "aesthetic treatments." Eligible sources were peer-reviewed original research, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines. Non-English articles, conference abstracts without full texts, and studies unrelated to facial treatments were excluded. Formal quality assessment and statistical analysis were not performed. Of 640 articles identified, 144 were included in the final synthesis. Findings highlight the multifactorial nature of facial ageing and recent advances supporting personalized interventions to enhance patient outcomes and quality of life.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.