ArticleCureus2025
Does Robotic Total Hip Arthroplasty Technology Have Any Benefit in Achieving Equal Limb Length via the Direct Anterior Approach?
Article in Cureus, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Leg length discrepancy (LLD) is a common and clinically significant complication following total hip arthroplasty (THA), potentially affecting functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Robotic-assisted THA has emerged as a promising alternative to conventional techniques, offering enhanced precision in implant positioning. This study aims to evaluate whether robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach provides significant advantages in achieving equal limb length compared to conventional techniques. Methodology A retrospective analysis was conducted among 200 patients with primary hip osteoarthritis who underwent THA via the direct anterior approach from February 2018 to August 2024. Of these, 100 patients underwent robotic-assisted THA, and 100 underwent conventional THA. Postoperative leg length measurements were obtained using standardized radiographs, and LLD was classified into mild (<5 mm), moderate (5-10 mm), and severe (>10 mm). Statistical analyses, including independent t-tests, chi-square tests, and analysis of covariance, were performed to compare LLD between the two groups while adjusting for age and body mass index (BMI). Results The robotic-assisted group demonstrated a significantly lower mean LLD compared to the conventional group (4.05 mm vs. 6.0 mm; p = 0.001). After adjusting for age and BMI, the difference remained significant (adjusted mean difference = -1.84 mm, 95% confidence interval = 0.638-3.03; p = 0.003). The rates of moderate-to-severe LLD were 55% in the conventional group and 44% in the robotic-assisted group, though this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.23). Conclusions Robotic-assisted THA via the direct anterior approach significantly reduces the magnitude of LLD compared to conventional techniques while achieving similar efficacy in minimizing severe discrepancies. These findings highlight the potential benefits of robotic assistance in optimizing surgical precision, though further research is needed to justify its cost-effectiveness and impact on long-term functional outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.