ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Time for a (Minority) Tax Cut: Examining the Responsibilities Faced by Women and Minorities Fostering Inclusivity in Orthopaedics.
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The existence of a "minority tax," defined as the burden of extra responsibilities placed on minorities relative to non-minorities of the same position, has been documented across various fields, including and beyond medicine. This study sought to quantify the types and extent of the minority tax faced by minority orthopaedic surgeons, as well as evaluate the degree to which this work was recognised and/or compensated. Methods: A survey was distributed via email and social media through the international network of associations, collectives, and societies of minorities in orthopaedics. The survey assessed demographics, involvement in diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) work, and characteristics of this work. Results: 290 orthopaedic surgeons from 37 countries completed the survey. Respondents were 91% female and 9% LGBTQ + . Fifty-seven percent reported engaging in DEI work. When asked if they worked on nights, weekends, or workdays, 22% indicated all three, and 30% indicated they worked on personal vacations. Only 18% had a title associated with their DEI work, with only one respondent (4%) indicating this was a paid position. Forty-six percent reported spending their own money on DEI work. Conclusions: This study is the first, to our knowledge, to quantify the minority tax in orthopaedic surgery. The results demonstrate that more than half of minority-identifying orthopaedic surgeons engage in DEI work, which involves a substantial investment of time and financial resources. Greater attention should be paid to deficits in compensation and recognition, with increased advocacy for fairness and equity for orthopaedic surgeons engaged in DEI work. Level of Evidence: III. Graphical abstract: Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01392-8.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.