ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Gender Equity Issues in Orthopaedics: A Scoping Review.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- What Women Want: A Call for Ergonomic, Equitable and Inclusive Orthopaedic Surgical Practice.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2026Article
- Steel and Grace: The Women Who Shaped Indian Orthopedic Surgery.Indian journal of orthopaedics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Patients have improved outcomes when their diversity is reflected in the healthcare team providing treatment. Despite recent increases in female representation, orthopaedics continues to lag behind other medical specialties. The purpose of this study was to identify major themes relating to gender equity in orthopaedics, examine trends in gender representation, and summarize the existing evidence within these themes. Methods: We conducted a scoping review in accordance with PRISMA guidelines using Medline, EMBASE and Global Index Medicus to identify original research articles on gender equity issues in orthopaedics. Data-driven studies examining issues across the orthopaedic training spectrum were included. A thematic analysis was conducted and descriptive statistics were used to describe trends within each theme. Results: In total, 179 studies were included representing seven themes: gender diversity and representation ( Conclusion: This scoping review identified a compelling volume of literature demonstrating that women are underrepresented across all career stages in orthopaedics. Women surgeons disproportionately experience microaggressions, discrimination and health impacts. While representation is improving, concerted, collaborative efforts are needed to achieve gender parity in the field globally. Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-025-01415-4.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.