ArticleIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Assessment of Bone Density in Osteogenesis Imperfecta in Pediatric and Adolescent Age Group: Can the Metacarpal Index Play a Role?
Article in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Osteogenesis Imperfecta (OI), an inherited genetic disorder affecting 1 in 20,000 people worldwide, is currently treated with bisphosphonates for moderate and severe forms. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is the standard method for assessing the improvement in bone quality in OI but due to the unavailability of DXA in some places, hand radiographs can be used to calculate the second metacarpal index (MCI) to assess the bone quality in many osteoporotic disorders. In this study we evaluated the feasibility of using metacarpal index to assess the bone quality in OI in children. Methods: We evaluated the MCI values in 37 children aged 1-18 years at baseline (before intervention), and following pamidronate treatment in 18 children with type III or type IV OI. Results: A decrease in MCI was noted with ageing as anticipated in the OI population, and we also observed an increase in MCI among the younger cohort (under 8 years) receiving pamidronate compared to the older cohort (above 8 years). The change in MCI after pamidronate therapy was monitored, and those who were initiated on pamidronate at a younger age showed more improvement in MCI than those who were started at a later age. Conclusions: Our study suggests that when DXA measurements are not feasible, MCI can be a potential tool to assess bone quality and evaluate bisphosphonate therapy in the OI population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.