Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116883›Full record

ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025

Women in Surgery: An Analysis of Mental Health, Stress Perception and Resilience.

Suzen Agharia, Hannah de Wet, Claudia Di Bella

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suzen AghariaFaculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-1065-6920
Hannah de WetSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, Melbourne, VIC Australia.
Claudia Di BellaOrthopaedic Department, Sarcoma Unit, St Vincent's Hospital Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9980-8672

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Although the representation of women in surgical fields is increasing, challenges such as gender bias, demanding work conditions, and balancing career with personal responsibilities persist. This study aims to investigate the stressors affecting female surgeons, assess their impact, and explore the resilience strategies employed to mitigate these effects. Methodology: A literature review was conducted using PubMed to identify peer-reviewed articles on mental health, stress perception, and coping among female surgeons. From the initial search, 49 articles were identified, with additional studies manually added from the references of reviewed literature. Results: The review highlighted key stressors for female surgeons, including workplace culture, gender bias, and sexual harassment. Resilience-building strategies, such as mindfulness and institutional support, were found to positively impact mental health and stress management. Female surgeons face unique stressors stemming from the demands of the profession, systemic gender biases, and entrenched cultural norms, leading to significant mental health challenges such as burnout and anxiety. While personal coping mechanisms, like mindfulness, show some efficacy in mitigating these issues, institutional-level challenges remain largely unaddressed. Gendered expectations and exclusionary workplace cultures continue to hinder progress, underscoring the need for structural reforms to improve the professional environment and promote the well-being of female surgeons. Conclusion: While resilience strategies offer some relief, substantial policy reform and a shift in workplace culture are crucial to creating a more supportive and equitable environment for women in surgery.

Indexed as

CopingMental healthResilienceStressWomen in surgery

Identifiers

PMID41116883
PMCPMC12535571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.