ReviewIndian journal of orthopaedics2025
Narrative Review: Approach to a Child with Supracondylar Humerus Fracture.
Review in Indian journal of orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Supracondylar humerus fractures are the commonest elbow injuries in children. In spite of recent advances, there is a dilemma on various aspects of treatment while approaching a child with supracondylar humerus fracture. Methods: This article is a narrative review of the available literature on the presentation and management of supracondylar humerus fracture in children to provide an overview on the choice of conservative vs surgical treatment, the correct timing of surgery, ideal pin configuration for the particular fracture pattern, indications for open reduction and management in the presence of associated neurovascular injury. Conclusions: The goal of treatment in supracondylar humerus fractures is to achieve union without causing any deformity or complications. A thorough knowledge of the pathoanatomy, classification, clinicoradiological assessment of the fracture and timely management are essential to achieve the desired goal. Closed reduction and percutaneous pinning is the most common form of treatment. Various modifications of the technique are recommended in certain cases. Proper classification of the fracture type is essential to decide the correct pin configuration. It is essential to identify associated vascular injury and manage it promptly to avoid any permanent morbidity. Majority of the nerve injuries are in the form of neuropraxia that heal spontaneously.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.