Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116867›Full record

ArticleSleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society2025

Social disadvantage is associated with impaired increase in salivary diurnal melatonin amplitude throughout pregnancy.

Ronald T McCarthy, Erin L Reinl, Patricia K Strutz, Peinan Zhao, Andrea Esparza, Emma R Sass, Meridith Schoening, Pranita Kaginele, Naiqi Shi, Madeline Canal and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sleep advances : a journal of the Sleep Research Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Ronald T McCarthyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5942-5968
Erin L ReinlDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Patricia K StrutzDepartment of Anesthesia, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Peinan ZhaoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Andrea EsparzaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Emma R SassDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Meridith SchoeningDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Pranita KagineleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Naiqi ShiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Madeline CanalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Jessica E ChubizDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Justin C FayDepartment of Biology, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1893-877X
Emily S JungheimDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Nandini RaghuramanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Lindsey N KentDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4990-8477
Rebecca C CoxDepartment of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Antonina I FrolovaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Erik D HerzogDepartment of Biology, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO, United States.
Sarah K EnglandDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4247-0281

Funding

REGULATION OF UTERINE SMOOTH MUSCLE EXCITABILITYR01HD037831 · NICHD · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI ENGLAND, SARAH K. · 1999 to 2023
$7.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD037831
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Study Objectives: Melatonin regulates daily rhythms and is important for maintaining a healthy pregnancy. Certain socioeconomic factors may affect melatonin release. This study evaluates whether the increase in melatonin with advancing gestation is associated with social disadvantage. Methods: Data were prospectively collected from a socioeconomically diverse cohort of participants with singleton pregnancies ( Results: Mean diurnal melatonin concentration increased at an average rate of 0.19 pg/mL/week, and amplitude increased by 0.04 pg/mL/week. Participants with high SDS had significantly lower diurnal melatonin concentration amplitudes, means, mesors, and peaks than those with low SDS. Participants with high SDS had a 2.19 [95%CI = 1.94, 2.47] adjusted relative risk for low diurnal amplitude melatonin and had a smaller increase in diurnal melatonin amplitude over weeks of pregnancy than those with low SDS (-0.04 vs. 0.11 pg/mL/week, Conclusions: Average salivary diurnal melatonin concentration increases across pregnancy, but the degree of increase varies among pregnant participants and is associated with social disadvantage.

Indexed as

melatoninpregnancysocial adversitywomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID41116867
PMCPMC12535763

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.