ArticleThe Pan African medical journal2025
Assessment of the National Disease Surveillance System in The Gambia, January 2025: best practices and lessons learned.
Article in The Pan African medical journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Assessing the implementation of the disease surveillance and response strategy in Togo.PLOS global public health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: the global trend of emerging and re-emerging diseases has highlighted surveillance as a fundamental pillar in ensuring global health security. The Gambia undertook a surveillance system assessment as part of a structured approach for surveillance system strengthening. We describe the best practices, key gaps, and critically analyse the system's capacity to collect complete, timely, and accurate data and the use of data for meaningful decision making. Methods: we conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study to assess both core and supporting surveillance functions. A total of 74 public and private health facilities, comprising 16 hospitals and 58 primary health care facilities from rural and urban settings, were randomly sampled from a sampling frame of 195 facilities. Data were collected by MoH staff from both central and regional levels with support from officers from the WHO Country Office. Frequency distribution tables were prepared, and proportions were calculated, stratified by region and health facility levels. Results: national surveillance guidelines were available in 66% of the health facilities. Standard case definitions for priority diseases were present in 91% of the health facilities. More than half (66%) of the health facilities could handle specimens until shipment. Overall, 20%, 32% and 42% of the health facilities analysed data by person, place, and time, respectively. All regions had demonstrated the capacity to transport samples to a higher-level laboratory. At the central level, there was no budget line for surveillance or epidemic response. Conclusion: investments in emergency preparedness and response mechanisms, building workforce capacity, and strengthening sample collection and transportation were evident. However, gaps remain in data analysis, implementation of eIDSR, and preparedness planning. Improving coordination, securing sustainable funding mechanisms, and implementation of EBS and CBS present key opportunities for system improvement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.