ArticleDigital health
Designing a just-in-time adaptive intervention with trigger detection and a generative chatbot: Smoking cessation use case.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A bibliometric analysis of research on the application of just-in-time adaptive interventions in mental health.Medicine · 2026Review
- A framework for longitudinal health AI agents.Nature health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This research aims to address the challenges of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in behaviour change by introducing an architecture that integrates both the tailoring of the message to the user profile and context, and the timing of the intervention by detecting the trigger of the behaviour. Methods: We designed a system that integrates trigger detection to determine optimal intervention moments and uses prompt engineering on a large language model (LLM) to give personalised support based on the detected trigger, the context, and personal information of the person. As a proof of concept, we applied this intervention to the domain of smoking cessation. We conducted an in-depth semi-structured interview with a domain expert to evaluate the correctness, relevancy and personalisation of the chatbot's responses. Results: An expert indicated that the support given by the chatbot is correct, personal, and tailored to the trigger and circumstances. While some suggestions were provided to further enhance the chatbot, its current capabilities were deemed effective and acceptable as a supportive tool for smoking cessation. Conclusions: An LLM with prompt engineering can be used to create a chatbot that can react to a trigger in a personalised way. Integrating both trigger detection and a generative chatbot into a JITAI is possible while ensuring privacy of the individual's personal information and circumstances.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.