ArticleDigital health
Care pathways combining digital therapeutics and conventional care for musculoskeletal disorders: State sequence analyses of 4-year claims data.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Digital therapeutics (DTx) are promising for treating musculoskeletal disorders (MSD) which contribute significantly to global disability. Despite full reimbursement of certified DTx in Germany and other countries, their utilization remains low, mainly because of uncertainty about how to integrate DTx best into standard patient care. Objective: Using four years of claims data, this cohort study employs state sequence analysis to describe the claims-documented use of DTx in combination with other therapies and the influence of different care pathways on the change of chronicity risk over time. Methods: Health claims data of 6090 DTx users from one of the largest German sickness fund were analyzed (2020-2023). First, three treatment events were classified: outpatient consultations, medication prescriptions, and conventional physical therapy. Second, hierarchical clustering based on patient pathways was performed. Third, associations between clusters and the change of the patients' pain chronicity risk over time (improved vs worsened/equal) were analyzed via binomial logistic regressions. Results: We identified distinct patient clusters and showed that older and more severe cases were more likely to receive more healthcare services in addition to DTx. Prescriptions of additional pain medications (OR = 2.16, 95% CI: 1.63-2.84, Conclusion: This study emphasizes the need to individualize the prescription of DTx and supplementary treatments based on patient age and complexity. The combination of DTx and conventional care is especially promising for patient groups with high pain chronicity risks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.