Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116782›Full record

ArticlePorto biomedical journal

State-wise geospatial analysis of dog bite burden in India from 2018 to 2023.

Dodda Basava Janekunte, Onkar Yadav Ninganna, Poorvitha Hadya Palaksha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Porto biomedical journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dodda Basava JanekunteJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Onkar Yadav NingannaJawaharlal Nehru Medical College, KAHER, Belagavi, Karnataka, India.
Poorvitha Hadya PalakshaMasters in Public health, School of Public health, JSSAHER, Mysore, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Around 59,000 rabies deaths still occur annually. According to WHO, India accounts for 36% of the global deaths due to rabies and 65% of the deaths due to rabies in the Southeast Asia region. India, being highly endemic for rabies, has the largest number of animal bites in the World. So, this study will identify the high-risk areas for dog bites in India through geospatial analysis for better outcomes. Objectives: To analyze the trends in dog bite cases in India from 2018 to 2023 and to identify the high-risk areas using geospatial analysis. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using open government data on dog bite cases across Indian states and union territories from 2018 to 2023. A geospatial analysis was done year-wise to identify high-risk areas for dog bites. Results: Dog bite cases peaked in 2018 (7.57 million), followed by a steady decline until 2022 (2.18 million), with an increase in 2023 (2.76 million). Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, and Maharashtra consistently reported the highest burden. Conclusions: While India has made progress in dog bite reduction through vaccination and sterilization programs, the increase in 2023 highlights the need for sustained efforts. Strengthening surveillance, improving public awareness, and ensuring widespread access to rabies prophylaxis are crucial for long-term control. Future research should focus on socioenvironmental determinants and intervention effectiveness to refine public health strategies.

Indexed as

epidemiologyneglected tropical diseasesrabieszoonoses

Identifiers

PMID41116782
PMCPMC12533994

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.