Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116766›Full record

ArticleVeterinary medicine international2025

Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices and Risk Perceptions of Antimicrobial Use and Resistance Among Small-Scale Fish Farmers in Cameroon.

Mohamed Moustapha Fokom Ndebé, Frédéric Moffo, Jenny Maïva Yango Tchoumbougnang, Mildred Naku Tangu, Cyrille Talla Ngueko, Julius Awah-Ndukum, Mohamed Moctar Mouliom Mouiche

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary medicine international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Mohamed Moustapha Fokom NdebéDepartment of Animal Science, Laboratory of Animal Physiology and Health, University of Dschang, BP 222, Dschang, West Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7685-043X
Frédéric MoffoDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ngaoundéré, BP 454, Ngaoundéré, Adamawa Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4915-2035
Jenny Maïva Yango TchoumbougnangDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ngaoundéré, BP 454, Ngaoundéré, Adamawa Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-8826-6400
Mildred Naku TanguDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ngaoundéré, BP 454, Ngaoundéré, Adamawa Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2874-8970
Cyrille Talla NguekoDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ngaoundéré, BP 454, Ngaoundéré, Adamawa Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7928-916X
Julius Awah-NdukumDepartment of Animal Science, Laboratory of Animal Physiology and Health, University of Dschang, BP 222, Dschang, West Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0930-2641
Mohamed Moctar Mouliom MouicheDepartment of Pharmacy, Pharmacology and Toxicology, University of Ngaoundéré, BP 454, Ngaoundéré, Adamawa Region, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-3670

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a complex public health problem that is caused mainly by the inappropriate use of antimicrobial agents. The rational use of antimicrobial agents, which is the main strategy for preventing AMR, can be achieved through farmers' knowledge and behaviour. Hence, this study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitudes and practices of fish farmers regarding antimicrobial use (AMU), AMR and their perceptions (KAPP) of the risk of the emergence of AMR in Cameroon. A cross-sectional study of 364 fish farmers was performed in the Adamawa, Centre, Littoral, South and West Regions using a questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were used to summarise the data. To compare group differences, the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon tests were run at a significance level of 0.05. Pearson correlation and linear regression were used to determine the directionality, magnitude and nature of the relationships among variables. Overall, the survey revealed poor knowledge of AMU (0.47 ± 0.19) and AMR (0.30 ± 0.29). The attitudes towards and practices of AMU were also poor (0.40 ± 0.28 and 0.47 ± 0.11, respectively). However, the level of risk perception of the emergence of AMR by the fish farmers was fair (0.50 ± 0.29). Locality, age, professional experience, educational level of the fish farmer, training in fish farming and presence of health agents on the farm were associated (

Indexed as

antimicrobial resistanceantimicrobial useattitudeCameroonfish farmersknowledgepracticerisk perception

Identifiers

PMID41116766
PMCPMC12535806

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.