ArticleInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
Perceptions of female age, health and attractiveness vary with systematic hair manipulations.
Article in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveResearch on female facial attractiveness has focused on the effects of face shape and skin condition. Few studies have investigated the impact of hair on assessments of female attractiveness. Research using images of computer-generated (rendered) hair has demonstrated that subtle variations in hair thickness, density and style affect perceptions of female age, health and attractiveness.
methodThe current study consisted of two experiments in which non-expert female panellists viewed distinct expressions of specific hair features and judged them for age, health and attractiveness. In Experiment 1, women from three countries (Germany, Spain and USA; n = 500 each) judged high-shine and low-shine versions of natural Caucasian hair wigs on a female target-photographed from right back (3/4 view)-for age, health and attractiveness. In Experiment 2, professional stylists manipulated shine, alignment and volume of natural Caucasian hair wigs, creating two versions-one high and one low in each feature-for blonde hair and brown hair. A woman with light skin pigmentation wore the wigs and was photographed in three head orientations under controlled lighting conditions. Omnibus pairwise combinations of hair conditions were created and judged by n = 2000 US women for age, health and attractiveness.
resultsExperiment 1 showed that, across countries, high-shine hair was rated more youthful, healthier and attractive than low-shine hair. Experiment 2 indicated that straight-aligned hair was perceived as most youthful, healthy and attractive, regardless of hair colour and head orientation. High shine also was preferred, although its impact was weaker than that of hair alignment.
conclusionStraight-aligned hair, together with shine, affects female appearance and this influence is noticeable even with small (mobile phone-sized) images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.