ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
Multi-Scale Fusion for Real-Time Image Observation and Data Analysis of Athletes after Soft Tissue Injury.
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
<p> Objective: To address insufficient segmentation accuracy in athletes' soft tissue injury analysis, this study proposes an enhanced Swin-Unet model with multiscale feature fusion via the FPN (Feature Pyramid Network) and an adaptive window selection mechanism for dynamic receptive field adjustment. </p> <p> Methods: A weighted hybrid loss function integrating Dice Loss, Cross-Entropy Loss, and boundary auxiliary loss optimizes segmentation precision and boundary recognition. </p> <p> Results: Evaluated on the OAI-ZIB dataset using 10-fold cross-validation, the model achieves a DSC (Dice Similarity Coefficient) of 0.978, outperforming baseline Swin-Unet and mainstream architectures. Superior performance is demonstrated in IoU (Intersection over Union) (0.968) and boundary Hausdorff distance (3.21), alongside significantly reduced diagnosis time (6.0 minutes vs. 16.8 minutes manually). </p> <p> Conclusion: This framework enhances real-time medical imaging analysis for athlete injuries, offering improved accuracy, efficiency, and clinical utility in soft tissue segmentation tasks. </p>.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.