ReviewThe European journal of neuroscience2025
Shielding the Mind With Flow: Attention Allocation and Auditory Event-Related Potentials Under Varying Mental Workload.
Review in The European journal of neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Shielding the Mind With Flow: Attention Allocation and Auditory Event-Related Potentials Under Varying Mental Workload.The European journal of neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Attention allows individuals to prioritize and effectively process relevant information while ignoring task-irrelevant distractions. It plays a critical role in task performance, learning, and creativity. This study examines how varying levels of workload influence auditory attention, cognitive resource allocation, and the experience of flow. Thirteen participants engaged in a game-based electroencephalographic study designed to induce states of mental underload, overload, and flow. To assess available attentional resources, an implicit auditory oddball task was integrated as a secondary task. Spatiotemporal cluster analyses revealed significant differences in event-related potentials when comparing flow and overload to underload. Multivariate pattern analysis successfully decoded all three conditions above chance level, particularly in centroparietal regions. Subjective measures, including the NASA Task Load Index and Flow Short Scale, along with behavioral performance metrics, confirmed the effective induction of flow and distinct levels of workload. Notably, participants demonstrated significantly higher performance and subjectively perceived valence during the flow condition compared to the overload condition, albeit with similar levels of neural engagement. Our results support the notion that experiencing flow may act as a "shielding mechanism," enhancing the effective allocation of attentional resources to the game and improving task engagement and performance efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.