Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116148›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2025

Use of artificial intelligence in diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury: a scoping review.

Cecily May, Murdoc Gould, Sreeja Natesan

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Cecily MayOrlando Science High School, Orlando, FL, United States.
Murdoc GouldBirkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Sreeja NatesanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine , 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC, 27710, United States. sreejanatesanmd@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) has been increasingly recognized as a leading cause of death and disability worldwide.ObjectiveTo summarize clinical applications of artificial intelligence, including machine learning and deep learning, in the diagnosis and prognosis of traumatic brain injury.MethodsThe authors conducted a scoping review of original clinical research studies on humans published in English after January 1, 2014. A search was performed using PubMed, including PMC, MEDLINE, and Bookshelf. The search terms were applied to the title field and included: (TBI) AND (Artificial Intelligence OR Machine Learning OR Deep Learning). Studies meeting inclusion criteria were screened and selected for review. The reference lists of the included studies were also screened to identify any additional eligible articles.ResultsOf 493 studies identified, seven met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis, which summarizes study title, publication year, study objective, key findings, and conclusions.ConclusionArtificial intelligence shows promise in aiding diagnosis and improving prognostic insights in traumatic brain injury. Although few clinical trials have been conducted, early results are encouraging. Future progress will require more clinical studies and efforts to address the current limitations of AI tools in medicine.

Identifiers

PMID41116148
PMCPMC12538859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.