ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2025
Occupational Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease: A Comprehensive Review.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Occupational determinants of national health screening participation: an analysis of the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES), 2007-2023.Annals of occupational and environmental medicine · 2026Article
- Occupational stress, cardiovascular vulnerability and sudden cardiac death in police officers: mechanisms and the protective role of structured exercise.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewCardiovascular disease (CVD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with occupational factors emerging as significant yet modifiable risk factors. This comprehensive review evaluates the association between various occupational exposures-including job stress, long working hours, shift work, physical activity at work, and exposure to hazardous substances-and CVD risk. Using the GRADE framework, we assessed the strength of evidence for each risk factor. RECENT
findingsJob stress, long working hours, night shift work, and carbon monoxide exposure demonstrated moderate evidence linking them to increased CVD risk, while occupational noise, air pollutants, and extreme temperatures had limited evidence. Physical activity at work and exposure to toxic metals showed inconclusive findings due to inconsistencies and indirectness in study populations. This review suggests that evaluating occupational exposures is essential for the early identification and management of individuals at elevated cardiovascular risk, and emphasizes that workplace interventions and health policies should prioritize reducing specific risk factors-such as job stress, long working hours, and hazardous exposures-to prevent CVD at both individual and population levels.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41116135What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.