ArticleScientific reports2025
Optimizing nutrient stoichiometry for enhanced carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Soil stoichiometric characteristics of protected cultivation systems in Northwest China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulphur (S) play a critical role in plant and microbial growth, as well as in stabilizing soil organic carbon (SOC). Humus, the most stable fraction of soil organic matter (SOM), maintains a consistent elemental ratio of C:N:P:S at 10,000:833:200:143. To evaluate how variations in this humus based C:N:P:S ratio affect SOC stabilization, a six-month laboratory incubation was conducted using selected benchmark soil series. The soils were amended with wheat straw (WS) and maize straw (MS), both with and without added inorganic nutrients (N, P, and S), to achieve two target C:N:P:S ratios aligned with humus stoichiometry 15% and 30% (C:N 12; C:P 50; C:S 70). Results showed that the MS30% and WS30% treatments reduced CO₂ efflux by 39% and 33%, respectively, compared to treatments without added nutrients. The MS15% and WS15% treatments also led to a 14% reduction in CO₂ emissions compared to the application of MS and WS alone. Moreover, supplementing WS and MS with nutrients to achieve a 30% humus-based ratio enhanced SOC stabilization by 11-25% over straw-only treatments. The study concludes that aligning organic and inorganic inputs to maintain a 30% humus-based C:N:P:S ratio significantly improves SOC stabilization. This highlights the vital role of balanced nutrient management in promoting carbon sequestration and overall soil health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.