Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116080›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Optimizing nutrient stoichiometry for enhanced carbon sequestration in agricultural soils.

Munazza Yousra, Qaiser Hussain, Khalid Saifullah Khan, Sair Sarwar, Muhammad Mahmood-Ul-Hassan, Sana Naeem, Tauseef Tabassum, Ehtesham Iqbal, Nadeem Ashraf, Asif Kamal and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Munazza YousraLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Qaiser HussainInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan. qaiser.hussain@uaar.edu.pk.
Khalid Saifullah KhanInstitute of Soil and Environmental Sciences, PMAS Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi, Pakistan.
Sair SarwarLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Muhammad Mahmood-Ul-HassanLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Sana NaeemLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Tauseef TabassumLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Ehtesham IqbalLand Resources Research Institute, National Agriculture Research Centre, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Nadeem AshrafUniversity of Agriculture, Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan.
Asif KamalDepartment of Plant Sciences, Faculty of Biological Science, Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad, Pakistan.
Gadah AlbasherDepartment of Zoology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia.
Atif Ali Khan KhalilDepartment of Biotechnology, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, 38541, South Korea. atif.ali@yu.ac.kr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nutrients like nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), and sulphur (S) play a critical role in plant and microbial growth, as well as in stabilizing soil organic carbon (SOC). Humus, the most stable fraction of soil organic matter (SOM), maintains a consistent elemental ratio of C:N:P:S at 10,000:833:200:143. To evaluate how variations in this humus based C:N:P:S ratio affect SOC stabilization, a six-month laboratory incubation was conducted using selected benchmark soil series. The soils were amended with wheat straw (WS) and maize straw (MS), both with and without added inorganic nutrients (N, P, and S), to achieve two target C:N:P:S ratios aligned with humus stoichiometry 15% and 30% (C:N 12; C:P 50; C:S 70). Results showed that the MS30% and WS30% treatments reduced CO₂ efflux by 39% and 33%, respectively, compared to treatments without added nutrients. The MS15% and WS15% treatments also led to a 14% reduction in CO₂ emissions compared to the application of MS and WS alone. Moreover, supplementing WS and MS with nutrients to achieve a 30% humus-based ratio enhanced SOC stabilization by 11-25% over straw-only treatments. The study concludes that aligning organic and inorganic inputs to maintain a 30% humus-based C:N:P:S ratio significantly improves SOC stabilization. This highlights the vital role of balanced nutrient management in promoting carbon sequestration and overall soil health.

Indexed as

CO₂ effluxNutrient managementSOC stabilizationSoil incubationStraw amendment

Identifiers

PMID41116080
PMCPMC12537904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.