Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116073›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A novel approach to predict the arctic stratospheric ozone from stratospheric polar vortex dynamics using explainable machine learning.

Anish Kumar, Joyjit Mandal, Sina Mehrdad, Christoph Jacobi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Anish KumarInstitute for Meteorology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany. anish.kumar@uni-leipzig.de.
Joyjit MandalDepartment of Computer Science, Central University of Rajasthan, Ajmer, India.
Sina MehrdadInstitute for Meteorology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.
Christoph JacobiInstitute for Meteorology, Leipzig University, Leipzig, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A significant decreasing trend of Arctic stratospheric ozone has been observed since 2019, with the first reported ozone hole in the Arctic Stratospheric Polar Vortex (SPV) in 2020, raising concerns for humanity. This underlines that it is essential to develop an algorithm capable of predicting Arctic ozone levels, preferably using minimal computing resources. This study presents a novel approach for ozone prediction based on the morphological and dynamical properties of the SPV utilizing a explainable machine learning approach. XGBoost exhibits good agreement with the observations, achieving an [Formula: see text] score of 0.80 and a correlation of 0.91. The algorithm accurately predicts the daily and seasonal patterns of ozone variations. It successfully captures the pattern of the lowest recorded ozone levels in 2020, though it overestimates ozone values by approximately 20 Dobson units. Moreover, in some years the predicted ozone values also show a strong alignment with the observations. Notably, the algorithm relies solely on physics based features of the SPV to predict chemical ozone loss, demonstrating the potential of dynamical parameters in predicting the ozone variability. It could serve as a tool for projecting future Arctic ozone variability by utilizing input from climate models that lack interactive chemistry.

Indexed as

Arctic ozone lossExplainable machine learningStratospheric polar vortex

Identifiers

PMID41116073
PMCPMC12537872

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.