ArticleNature materials2025
Drawing boundaries between feasible and unfeasible zeolite intergrowths using high-throughput computational screening with synthesis validation.
Article in Nature materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Low-Dimensional Zeotypes Templated by Stacked Cyclic Benzimidazolium Revealed by Electron Crystallography.Journal of the American Chemical Society · 2026Article
- Growing together.Nature materials · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Zeolites are a class of porous crystalline silicate-based materials with applications such as catalysis and separation. Zeolite intergrowths can have superior performance compared with conventional single-phase zeolites in these applications. This study develops a computational workflow to evaluate ~1.03 trillion atomistic structures to identify promising zeolite intergrowths through geometrical analysis and atomistic simulations. We find that interfacial energy is an excellent descriptor to distinguish hydrothermally synthesized zeolite intergrowths from the others, showing almost-perfect classification performance (area under the curve of 0.995). Computational screening workflow saves 100% of hydrothermally synthesized zeolite pairs and successfully rejects 99.3% of hypothetical pairs. Network analyses reveal that hypothetical pairs comparable to experimentally proven ones show substantial topological and chemical similarities, although such information is not directly used in the screening workflow. One of the hypothetical candidates that passed the criteria is experimentally realized by direct and seed-assisted hydrothermal syntheses, thereby broadening the applicable scope of zeolite intergrowths to zincosilicates with three and nine rings.
Identifiers
41116052What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.