Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116052›Full record

ArticleNature materials2025

Drawing boundaries between feasible and unfeasible zeolite intergrowths using high-throughput computational screening with synthesis validation.

Kota Oishi, Koki Muraoka, Satoko Toyama, Takeshi Iwata, Takehito Seki, Naoya Shibata, Kenta Iyoki, Toru Wakihara, Tatsuya Okubo, Akira Nakayama

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature materials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Growing together.Nature materials · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kota OishiDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Koki MuraokaDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. muraok_k@chemsys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1830-7978
Satoko ToyamaInstitute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8128-3094
Takeshi IwataInstitute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takehito SekiInstitute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5437-6351
Naoya ShibataInstitute of Engineering Innovation, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3548-5952
Kenta IyokiDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1111-7111
Toru WakiharaDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuya OkuboDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Akira NakayamaDepartment of Chemical System Engineering, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo, Japan. nakayama@chemsys.t.u-tokyo.ac.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7330-0317

Funding

MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJER2202MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJPR2378MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJPR24J7MEXT | Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) JPMJSP2108MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) 22K14751Ministry of the Environment (Ministry of the Environment, Government of Japan) JPMEERF20242M01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Zeolites are a class of porous crystalline silicate-based materials with applications such as catalysis and separation. Zeolite intergrowths can have superior performance compared with conventional single-phase zeolites in these applications. This study develops a computational workflow to evaluate ~1.03 trillion atomistic structures to identify promising zeolite intergrowths through geometrical analysis and atomistic simulations. We find that interfacial energy is an excellent descriptor to distinguish hydrothermally synthesized zeolite intergrowths from the others, showing almost-perfect classification performance (area under the curve of 0.995). Computational screening workflow saves 100% of hydrothermally synthesized zeolite pairs and successfully rejects 99.3% of hypothetical pairs. Network analyses reveal that hypothetical pairs comparable to experimentally proven ones show substantial topological and chemical similarities, although such information is not directly used in the screening workflow. One of the hypothetical candidates that passed the criteria is experimentally realized by direct and seed-assisted hydrothermal syntheses, thereby broadening the applicable scope of zeolite intergrowths to zincosilicates with three and nine rings.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.