Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116049›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Determinants of empiric combination antibiotic therapy for hospital associated bloodstream infections in the intensive care unit.

Evaldas Kauzonas, Gustav Torisson, Juan Merlo, Raquel Perez, Alexis Tabah, Niccolò Buetti, Stéphane Ruckly, François Barbier, Jean-François Timsit, Fredrik Sjövall and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Evaldas KauzonasDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sölvegatan 19, 221 84, Lund, Sweden. evaldas.kauzonas@med.lu.se.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8380-9686
Gustav TorissonClinical Infection Medicine, Department of Translational Medicine Malmö, Lund University, Ruth Lundskogs Gata 3, 214 28, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9012-2068
Juan MerloUnit for Social Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms Gata 35, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8379-9708
Raquel PerezUnit for Social Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Jan Waldenströms Gata 35, 205 02, Malmö, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6273-1656
Alexis TabahIntensive Care Unit, Redcliffe Hospital, Metro North Hospital and Health Services, Redcliffe, QLD, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3513-2778
Niccolò BuettiInfection Control Program and WHO Collaborating Centre, Geneva University Hospitals and Faculty of Medicine, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8096-1834
Stéphane RucklyUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, 75018, Paris, France.
François BarbierService de Médecine Intensive-Réanimation, Centre Hospitalier Régional d'Orléans, 14, Avenue de L'Hôpital, 45100, Orléans, France.
Jean-François TimsitUniversité de Paris, INSERM, IAME UMR 1137, 75018, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6063-7383
Fredrik SjövallDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Sölvegatan 19, 221 84, Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5612-0325
EUROBACT-2 Study Group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Empiric combination antibiotic therapy (ECAT) is commonly used to treat healthcare-associated bloodstream infections (HA-BSIs) and sepsis. However, the level of supporting evidence is low and clinical practice varies significantly. We conducted a post hoc analysis using the EUROBACT-2 international cohort study database, which contained data on 2406 adult patients from 328 intensive care units (ICUs) across 52 countries, collected between June 2019 and January 2021. The main outcome was the proportion of patients receiving ECAT for HA-BSIs. Patient and institutional factors influencing the use of ECAT were examined using Markov-Chain Monte Carlo estimation. Three quarters of patients (75.2%; n = 1810) received empiric antibiotic therapy, with ECAT used in approximately half of cases (52.5%; n = 950). Most patients receiving ECAT (70.4%; n = 669) were treated with two antibiotics, beta-lactams plus glycopeptides being the most common combination (40.2%; n = 382). The odds of ECAT were increased by immune deficiency (OR 1.35 [95% CrI 1.03-1.75]), SOFA scores > 11 (OR 1.77 [95% CrI 1.28-2.46]), uncommon sources of infection (OR 1.63 [95% CrI 1.02-2.59]), and admission to ICUs where > 25% of Enterobacteriaceae isolates produce carbapenemases (OR 2.46 [95% CrI 1.37-4.41). The intra-class correlation coefficients at the ICU and country levels were 23.2% and 4.4%, respectively. In conclusion, factors at the individual, institutional, and national levels may affect the use of ECAT to treat HA-BSIs. Given the impact of institutional variables on the use of ECAT and the inconclusive evidence regarding its potential risks, it is of great importance that treatment is tailored based on local antibiotic stewardship programs and the needs of the individual patient.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsBacteremiaCross InfectionIntensive Care UnitsSepsisAdultAgedDrug Therapy, CombinationFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsBloodstream infectionCombination antibiotic therapyEmpiric antibiotic therapyNosocomial infectionSepsis treatment

Identifiers

PMID41116049
PMCPMC12537954

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.