ReviewPediatric research2026
From pulmonary to ocular protection: rethinking inhaled nitric oxide in preterm infants with pulmonary hypertension.
Review in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) and retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) are traditionally regarded as distinct morbidities in preterm infants, yet both share common antecedents such as oxygen instability, hyperoxia, and inflammation. Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is established as first-line therapy for PPHN, but its broader impact on extra-pulmonary vascular development has remained uncertain. In a nationwide U.S. study, Cho et al. reported that PPHN was independently associated with an increased risk of ROP, and that iNO administration in infants with PPHN was linked to a reduced incidence of severe ROP. Our Japanese cohort studies complement these findings by showing that PPHN independently predicted long-term visual impairment, even after adjusting for severe ROP, and that coexistence with bronchopulmonary dysplasia further amplified ocular risk. In contrast, post-acute iNO use beyond the first week of life, typically in infants with established severe lung disease, was not associated with improved neurodevelopmental or visual outcomes. Together, these observations suggest that PPHN represents a systemic vascular phenotype and that the impact of iNO depends critically on timing and pathology. Integrating pulmonary and ocular outcomes in both clinical management and research may reframe PPHN therapy as multi-organ protection for extremely preterm infants. IMPACT: This Commentary highlights the emerging recognition of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) as a systemic vascular risk phenotype that links pulmonary and ocular outcomes in preterm infants. By integrating evidence from U.S. population data and Japanese cohort studies, it emphasizes the phase-specific effects of inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) on both pulmonary and retinal health. The article reframes PPHN management as a strategy for multi-organ protection and underscores the importance of future prospective trials that include visual outcomes alongside traditional respiratory and survival endpoints.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41116023What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.