Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41116002›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2025

Compassion for others and well-being: a meta-analysis.

M Zhuniq, F Winter, C Aguilar-Raab

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

M ZhuniqClinical Psychology, Interaction- and Psychotherapy Research, Institute for Compassionate Awareness and Interdependence Research and Practice IN-CARE, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
F WinterClinical Psychology, Interaction- and Psychotherapy Research, Institute for Compassionate Awareness and Interdependence Research and Practice IN-CARE, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
C Aguilar-RaabClinical Psychology, Interaction- and Psychotherapy Research, Institute for Compassionate Awareness and Interdependence Research and Practice IN-CARE, School of Social Sciences, University of Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany. corina.aguilar-raab@uni-mannheim.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Compassion has been shown to improve well-being across multiple settings. While the link between self-compassion and well-being is well-established, findings on compassion for others have been more mixed. Using a multilevel approach, this meta-analysis of 54 effect sizes examined the relationship between compassion for others and well-being. The results revealed a moderate, statistically significant positive association (r = .26), suggesting that compassion for others contributes meaningfully to overall well-being. This relationship was consistent for psychological well-being, cognitive well-being, social well-being, and positive affect, whereas the results were weaker for negative affect. Furthermore, results showed that this relationship is not moderated by age, gender, or region. In addition, we examined if there is a causal relationship between compassion for others and well-being examining six effect sizes for state and trait compassion interventions. The results showed moderate improvements in well-being following compassion-based training, indicating promising but preliminary evidence for a causal effect. However, the absence of consistent control group comparisons limits firm conclusions about causality. This meta-analysis presents the first rigorous synthesis of evidence linking compassion for others to well-being, highlighting compassion for others as a distinct and meaningful contributor.

Indexed as

EmpathyFemaleHumansMaleCompassion for othersEmpathic concernMeta-analysisModeratorSystematic reviewWell-being

Identifiers

PMID41116002
PMCPMC12537975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.