ArticleScientific reports2025
Safety and efficacy of different therapeutic regimens in Egyptian adults with moderate COVID-19 infection (EVEREST): a real-world retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study seeks to disseminate insights from Egypt's management of COVID-19 patients by evaluating the effectiveness and safety of various treatment regimens using combined repurposed antivirals. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 310 moderate hospitalized COVID-19 cases. Patients were divided into four treatment arms: standard care, sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (sovodak) plus ivermectin, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LED) plus hydroxychloroquine, and SOF/LED plus ivermectin. The study analyzed parameters such as hospitalization days, total clinical recovery percentage, and progressive CT chest changes. The median hospitalization days significantly differed in arm 1 versus arms 2 and 3 (p < 0.001 and p = 0.025, respectively). There was a difference between arms 1 and 4 in the days till clinical improvement (p = 0.007). Complete normalization of vital signs occurred in 26% of arm 4 patients versus 43% in arm 1 (p = 0.023), and a statistically significant difference in the proportion of patients with total clinical recovery was found between arms 1 and 2 (p = 0.009). All arms displayed a statistically significant lower proportion of patients with progressive CT scans compared to arm 1. Our study reveals that most tested antiviral combinations effectively reduced hospitalization days and progressive CT scans. These regimens demonstrated efficacy in treating moderate COVID-19 to prevent disease progression and complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.