Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115987›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of pediatrics2025

Diaphragmatic ultrasonography: reference values and reliability for thickness, thickening fraction, and excursion in neonates.

Marcos Giovanni Santos Carvalho, Juliana Nasu Tomiyama, Marcelo Azeredo Terra, Fernanda Cordoba Lanza

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of pediatrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marcos Giovanni Santos CarvalhoGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Rua Engenho Grande, 75 Ap 9091 Bloco 2, 31320-470, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4264-8361
Juliana Nasu TomiyamaMaternidade Balbina Mestrinho, Secretaria de Estado de Saúde (SES), Manaus, Amazonas, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0009-4306-4948
Marcelo Azeredo TerraMterra Ensino E Consultoria, Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5016-8640
Fernanda Cordoba LanzaGraduate Program in Rehabilitation Science, Physical Therapy Department, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais-UFMG, Rua Engenho Grande, 75 Ap 9091 Bloco 2, 31320-470, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil. lanzafe@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4748-6947

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To establish reference values and assess the intra- and inter-rater reliability of inspiratory diaphragmatic thickness (IDT), expiratory diaphragmatic thickness (EDT), diaphragmatic thickening fraction (DTF), and diaphragmatic excursion (DE) using ultrasound, including the lower (LLN) and upper (ULN) limits of normality in neonates. This cross-sectional study included healthy neonates from a public hospital (July 2022-December 2023). IDT, EDT, DTF, and DE were measured by PT 1 (an experienced ultrasound physiotherapist). Reliability was assessed by having PT 1 and PT 2 (experts ultrasound physiotherapists) independently evaluate the exams twice using ImageJ software. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated to assess intra- and inter-rater reliability. One hundred neonates were assessed [39 (38-40) weeks, 3168 ± 475 g, 49 (47.5-50) cm]. Reference values were EDT: 2.17 ± 0.59 mm, LLN: 2.05 mm and ULN: 2.29 mm; IDT: 1.71 ± 0.48 mm, LLN: 1.62 mm and ULN: 1.80 mm; DTF: 28.02 ± 9.88%, LLN: 26.08% and ULN: 29.96%; DE: 2.47 ± 0.72 mm, LLN: 2.33 mm and ULN: 2.61 mm. No significant differences were observed between the assessments of PT 1 and PT 2 (p > 0.05), intra- and inter-rater reliability were ICC ≥ 0.98 (0.97-1.00) (p < 0.001) and ICC ≥ 0.91 (0.85-0.99) (p < 0.001), respectively.

conclusionThe established values support interpreting neonatal diaphragmatic function and detecting changes in contractility and motion range, with high intra- and inter-rater reliability for EDT, IDT, DTF, and DE. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Diaphragmatic ultrasound is used to assess diaphragm function in various clinical contexts; however, its reliability and reference values for neonates are limited. WHAT IS NEW: • Performing diaphragmatic ultrasound in neonates requires specific precautions to obtain accurate and reliable measurements. • The established normal, lower, and upper limits for diaphragmatic thickness and excursion support the functional assessment of the diaphragm in neonates by aiding in the detection of changes in contractility and movement, providing valuable reference values for clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

DiaphragmCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleObserver VariationReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsUltrasonographyDiaphragm excursionDiaphragm thicknessNewbornUltrasound

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.