ArticleScientific reports2025
Neurophysiological correlates to the human brain complexity through q-statistical analysis of electroencephalogram.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantum-Inspired and Non-Classical Approaches to Consciousness: Models, Evidence and Constraints.Brain sciences · 2026Review
- Complexity and psychopathology: from mechanistic science to a physical understanding of the mental conditions based on chaos and complexity.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The prospects of assessing neural complexity (NC) by q-statistics of the systemic organization of different types and levels of brain activity were studied. In 70 adult subjects, NC was assessed via the parameter q of q-statistics, applied to the ongoing EEG and of 20 scalp points (channels). The NC were estimated both globally for all channels (AllCh) and locally (for each single channel) in different Functional States (FSs). The values of q was compared among FSs and single channels, as well they were correlated with the power of θ (4-8Hz), [Formula: see text] (15-25Hz) and others EEG bands, in each FS. The value of q across all FSs was higher for AllCh than for the single channels FSs. Consistently with previous studies, we found a negative correlation between NC and age. The FSs did not influence the q of the EEG in AllCh, although locally the FS modulated q in a consistent manner (e.g., reducing q in posterior sites with eyes closed). The q was correlated positively with the power of the θ and negatively with that of the [Formula: see text] band in general. These findings support the idea that, as a first approach, q-statistics seems to be related to the human NC. The relationship between q and θ power aligns with greater NC during FSs such as listening music and resting with eyes open, which is consistent with high-order representations rather than low-informative attentional tasks (OddBall).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.