Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115974›Full record

SynthesisJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2025

Retrospective cohort study and meta-analysis of individualized luteal phase support with additional oral dydrogesterone in artificially prepared frozen embryo transfer cycles.

Ornella Cucchietti, Caroline Mollevi, Lionel Moulis, Tal Anahory, Stephanie Huberlant, Sophie Brouillet, Noémie Ranisavljevic, Martha Duraes

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ornella CucchiettiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Caroline MolleviService de Santé Publique (SSP), CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Lionel MoulisService de Santé Publique (SSP), CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Tal AnahoryDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Stephanie HuberlantDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, CHU Caremeau, Nimes, France.
Sophie BrouilletDepartment of Reproductive Biology, CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
Noémie Ranisavljevic *Department of Reproductive Medicine, CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France. n-ranisavljevic@chu-montpellier.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1956-8571
Martha Duraes *Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, CHU and University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDoes additional oral dydrogesterone (DYD) in luteal phase support enhance reproductive outcomes, in patients with low serum progesterone (P4) concentrations undergoing frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) with hormonal replacement therapy (HRT)?

methodsThis retrospective study analyzed 550 HRT cycles performed for FET between November 2020 and September 2023. Luteal phase support included micronized vaginal progesterone 400 mg twice daily. After two full day of progesterone administration, serum P4 levels were assessed: group 1 cycles with sufficient P4 levels continuing the routine protocol were compared to group 2 cycles with low serum P4 (< 11 ng/mL) who received additional oral DYD supplementation (10 mg three times daily). Primary outcome was live birth rate (LBR), with a multivariate regression analysis. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the current literature on DYD supplementation during HRT was also performed (PROSPERO registration number: CRD420250524058).

resultsInsufficient P4 levels were observed in 28.9% (159/550) of the studied cycles. LBR was comparable in both groups (24.16% [94/391] in group 1 and 27.22% [43/159] in group 2) and was not associated with the luteal support strategy (aOR 1.01, 95% CI [0.65-1.58], p = 0.96). In the meta-analysis, the ongoing pregnancy rate was similar in both groups (aOR 1.14, 95% CI [0.91-1.42]).

conclusionsIndividualized luteal phase support with DYD supplementation in patients with low luteal serum P4 levels during an HRT cycle for FET achieves LBR comparable to those observed in patients with adequate serum P4 levels, both in this cohort study and in a complementary meta-analysis.

Indexed as

DydrogesteroneEmbryo TransferLuteal PhaseAdministration, OralAdultBirth RateCryopreservationFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLive BirthOvulation InductionPregnancyPregnancy RateProgesteroneProgestinsDydrogesteroneProgesteroneProgestinsDydrogesteroneFrozen-thawed embryo transferHormonal replacement therapyIndividualized luteal phase supportLuteal serum progesteroneMeta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID41115974
PMCPMC12705512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.