ArticleScientific reports2025
Resting-state functional connectivity correlates of gait and turning performance in multiple sclerosis: a multivariate pattern analysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Turns and Turn-Related Falls: Stepping on a Rotating Platform as a Potential Approach to Foster Adapted Muscular and Neural Plasticity in Fragile Persons and Patients with Motor Impairment.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the "RehabXR" virtual reality system for vestibular rehabilitation: evidence of changes in functional brain connectivity in warfighters with chronic mild traumatic brain injury.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) often leads to mobility impairments, yet the neural mechanisms underlying these deficits remain poorly understood. This study examined whether resting-state functional connectivity (rs-FC) differs between people with MS (PwMS) and healthy controls in relation to spatiotemporal mobility performance. We hypothesized that group differences within the default mode (DMN), frontoparietal (FPN), somatomotor (SN), and visual (VIS) networks would be associated with gait and turning metrics. Twenty-nine PwMS and 28 matched controls completed a two-minute walk test, 180° walking turns, and 360° in-place turns at natural and fast speeds. fMRI data were analyzed using multivariate pattern analysis (MVPA) and post-hoc seed-to-voxel analyses for gait speed, cadence, double support time, stride length, turn duration, peak velocity, and turn angle. PwMS exhibited slower gait speed, shorter stride length, and impaired 360° turning, but no group differences in cadence, double support, or 180° turn metrics. MVPA revealed rs-FC differences across DMN, FPN, SN, and VIS networks. While rs-FC differences were evident for walking metrics, within-group associations were not significant. In contrast, 360° turn angle showed distinct within-group rs-FC associations, particularly involving VAN and DAN networks. These findings highlight turning as a sensitive task for capturing functional neural differences in MS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.