ArticleNature communications2025
Artificial intelligence coupled to pharmacometrics modelling to tailor malaria and tuberculosis treatment in Africa.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- New thinking for the next generation of antimalarials.EMBO molecular medicine · 2026Review
- Application of artificial intelligence in geriatric infection: recent advances and prospects.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- Reinventing malaria control: hierarchical intervention strategies for African settings based on the microbiota-barrier-innate immunity axis.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Africa's vast genetic diversity poses challenges for optimising drug treatments in the continent, which is exacerbated by the fact that drug discovery and development efforts have historically been performed outside Africa. This has led to suboptimal therapeutic outcomes in African populations and overall scarcity of relevant pharmacogenetic data, including characteristic genotypes as well as drugs prescribed in the continent to treat infectious diseases. Here, we propose a general approach to identify drug-gene pairs with potential pharmacogenetic interest. Our pipeline couples machine learning and artificial intelligence with physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) and non-linear mixed effects (NLME) modelling to hypothesize which pharmacogenes could be of potential clinical interest, and which dose adjustments could be made to provide better treatment outcomes for African populations. Drug-gene pairs are first ranked with the latest knowledge embedding techniques, based on public structural and bioactivity data for drugs and genes, followed by a large language model-based refinement. Selected genes are then evaluated for their sensitivity in PBPK analysis, and relevant variants subsequently inspected with NLME for dose optimization. The analysis is focused on genes with potential clinical relevance in Africa. We delve deeper into malaria and tuberculosis therapies, many of which remain uncharacterised from a pharmacogenetic perspective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.