Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41115805›Full record

ArticleGenome research2025

PoreMeth2 for decoding the evolution of methylome alterations with nanopore sequencing.

Gianluca Mattei, Marta Baragli, Barbara Gega, Alessandra Mingrino, Martina Chieca, Tommaso Ducci, Gianmaria Frigè, Luca Mazzarella, Romina D'Aurizio, Francesco De Logu and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Gianluca Mattei *Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; albertomagi@gmail.com gianluca.mattei@unifi.it marta.baragli@unifi.it.
Marta Baragli *Department of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; albertomagi@gmail.com gianluca.mattei@unifi.it marta.baragli@unifi.it.
Barbara GegaDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Alessandra MingrinoDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Martina ChiecaDepartment of Health Science, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Tommaso DucciDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Gianmaria FrigèDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.
Luca MazzarellaDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4043-3279
Romina D'AurizioInstitute of Informatics and Telematics (IIT), CNR, 56124 Pisa, Italy.
Francesco De LoguDepartment of Health Science, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Romina NassiniDepartment of Health Science, Clinical Pharmacology and Oncology Section, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.
Pier Giuseppe PelicciDepartment of Experimental Oncology, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milano, Italy.
Alberto MagiDepartment of Information Engineering, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy; albertomagi@gmail.com gianluca.mattei@unifi.it marta.baragli@unifi.it.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In epigenetic analysis, the identification of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) typically involves the detection of consecutive CpGs groups that show significant changes in their average methylation levels. However, the methylation state of a genomic region can also be characterized by a mixture of patterns (epialleles) with variable frequencies, and the relative proportions of such patterns can provide insights into its mechanisms of formation. Traditional methods based on bisulfite conversion and high-throughput sequencing, such as Illumina, owing to the read size (150 bp) allow epiallele frequency analysis only in high CpG density regions, limiting differential methylation studies to just 50% of the human methylome. Nanopore sequencing, with its long reads, enables the analysis of epiallele frequency across both high and low CpG density regions. Here, we introduce a novel computational approach, PoreMeth2, an R library that integrates epiallelic diversity and methylation frequency changes from nanopore data to identify DMRs, providing insights into their possible mechanisms of formation, and annotate them to genic and regulatory elements. We apply PoreMeth2 to cancer and glial cell data sets, providing evidence of its advance over other state-of-the-art methods and demonstrating its ability to distinguish epigenomic alterations with a strong impact on gene expression from those with weaker effects on transcriptional activity.

Indexed as

EpigenomeDNA MethylationEpigenomicsHumansNanopore SequencingNeurogliaSoftware

Identifiers

PMID41115805
PMCPMC12581943

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.